Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2013 Year 2013 This

Refund Claim – Notification No.19/2004 - 100% EOU - Export of ...

Case Laws     Central Excise

August 23, 2013

Refund Claim – Notification No.19/2004 - 100% EOU - Export of goods after clearance to DTA - Non-preparation of statutory document and not following the basic procedure of export goods as discussed above, cannot be treated as just a minor/technical procedural lapse for the purpose of granting rebate of duty on the materials used in the manufacture of impugned exported goods - CGOVT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Refund - Rule 5 of the CER, 2004 - 100% EOU - instead of utilizing the credit accumulated due to export for DTA clearance, EOU unit claimed refund - Refund allowed - AT

  2. Denial of exemption benefits under Notifications 30/2004-CE and 23/2003-CE for clearances of finished goods into the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) by a 100% Export Oriented...

  3. 100% EOU - demand of differential duty - excess DTA clearance, over and above their DTA Sale Entitlement - when 100% EOU has submitted the permission to sell goods...

  4. 100% EOU - de-bonding - refund of the excise duty previously paid - Admittedly, such duty was paid at the time of what is referred to de-bonding. However, this would not...

  5. Allowability of refund of Cenvat credit availed on inputs used in the manufacture of goods cleared by DTA unit to a 100% Export Oriented Unit - DTA unit clearing goods...

  6. Denial of rebate claim - 100% EOU - no duty was required to be paid on such exported goods. Rebate claimed is not admissible in terms of Rule 18 of the Central Excise...

  7. Deemed export - TED refund - Supply of intermediate goods by the DTA unit to 100% EOU unit - When there is an exemption, then, this refund claim was rightly disallowed - HC

  8. Refund - the clearances made by one 100% EOU to another 100% EOU which are deemed exports are to be treated as physical exports for the purpose of entitling refund of...

  9. Manufacturer cleared excisable goods to Mega Power Projects and SEZ units. Refund claim filed for accumulated CENVAT credit u/r 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Refund...

  10. 100% EOU - Refund claim - Rule 5 of CCR, 2004 - rejection of refund claims merely on the ground of nexus with the manufacture of the product is not legally tenable - AT

  11. Exemption under Notification No.8/97-CE, dated 1.3.1997 - finished goods manufactured by the 100% EOU out of the raw material supplied by another 100% EOU - Clearance to...

  12. Clearances made by one 100% EOU to another 100% EOU which are deemed exports are to be treated as physical exports for the purpose of entitling refund of unutilized...

  13. Clearances made by one 100% EOU to another 100% EOU which are deemed exports are to be treated as physical exports for the purpose of entitling refund of unutilized...

  14. 100% EOU wrongly claimed refund u/r 96 instead of Rule 89 of CGST Rules, 2017 on IGST paid on inputs/capital goods utilized for exports. HC held EOU entitled to...

  15. Rabte / refund claim - Export of goods after 6 months from the date of clearance of goods from factory - violation to permission of Notification No.19/2004-CE(NT) dated...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates