Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2013 Year 2013 This

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act is deleted as ...

Case Laws     Income Tax

November 11, 2013

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act is deleted as the entire income has been properly disclosed in the return filed by the assesse in response to notice u/s 153A - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

  2. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) r.w.s. 274 - additional income declared in the return filed in response to notice u/s 153A as compared to original returned filed u/s...

  3. Penalty levied u/s. 271(1)(c) - Income disclosed by the assessee in the Return of Income which is not part of Regular Accounts - CIT(A) directed the AO that levy penalty...

  4. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act – short term capital gains was not disclosed in the return of income - levy of penalty confirmed - AT

  5. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income was declared in survey u/s 133A - date of filing of return u/s 139(1) had not expired - The fact of “concealment of income” and...

  6. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Explanation is bonafide is, we find, supported by the fact that during assessment proceedings the assessee, realizing his mistake even before...

  7. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee filed return of income in response to notice u/s 148 - No difference between returned income and assessed income - Assessee voluntarily...

  8. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

  9. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

  10. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disclosure of income during survey - had it been the intention of the appellant to disclose the income voluntarily then the assessee would have...

  11. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Even if some discrepancies were found during the survey resulting in surrender of income by the assessee, once the assessee has declared...

  12. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Capital gain on sale of property - Allegation of the AO that, return of income has not been filed voluntarily - There was a reasonable...

  13. MAT is paid, additions were made to regular income, penalty not levied – 115JB, 271(1)(c)

  14. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - large income admitted in the returns filed u/s. 153A - Had it been there is no search, the assessee would not have disclosed the income...

  15. Penalty levied u/s 271 (1) (c) - As the appellants had disclosed the income, after detection by the department and as per the terms of settlement, the assessing officer...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates