Penalty – Second notice issued u/s 158BFA(2) does not confer any ...

Second Notice u/s 158BFA(2) Cannot Extend Time or Initiate New Penalty Proceedings Against Taxpayer.

March 8, 2014

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty – Second notice issued u/s 158BFA(2) does not confer any power to Revenue to Denovo penalty proceedings against the assessee - The statutory time limit cannot be enlarged with the issuance of fresh notice - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty – Second notice issued u/s 158BFA(2) does not confer any ...

Second Notice u/s 158BFA(2) Cannot Extend Time or Initiate New Penalty Proceedings Against Taxpayer.

March 8, 2014

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 272A(2)(g) was levied for not issuing TDS certificates in Form 16A to deductees on time. The issue pertained to the period of limitation for issuing the...

The court held that Section 6(2)(b) of the Act treats the empowered officers under the SGST/UGST Act at the central level to be at par and does not prescribe for...

Initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271C and the limitation period for levying such penalty. The key points are: The penalty proceedings were initiated on the date of...

Proceedings initiated u/s 144C - legality of the order by framing the so-called draft assessment order - while framing the said draft assessment order, the AO not only...

Once proceedings of penalty us 273(2)(a) or sec.273(2)(aa) have not been initiated in the regular assessment by AO, then penalty proceedings cannot be initiated in the...

HC held that the second Section 148 notice was issued beyond the statutory limitation period of four years from the end of AY 2016-17. The first Section 148 notice was...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Validity of notice - It is a well settled proposition of law that penalty cannot be initiated for the limb, which is different from the limb for...

Validity of Notice issued u/s 143(2) - Defective return - Removal of defect beyond 15 days u/s 139(9) - AO should have treated the return as non-est when the assessee...

The ITAT held that the limitation period for issuing a notice u/s 143(2) is relevant to the financial year and assessment year. When the Assessing Officer considered the...

Penalty u/s. 272A(2)(c) - non-submission of information as willful default - Addl. CIT initiated penalty proceedings by issuing only one notice but levied penalty for...

The ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal, holding that penalty under s.271G for failure to furnish transfer pricing documentation cannot be levied against the German resident...

HC ruled on the validity of a show cause notice (SCN) under GST law regarding time limitations. The Court examined Section 73(2) and 75 of GST Act, determining that...

Time limit for furnishing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the newly migrated taxpayers extended.

The key points are regarding the penalty imposed u/s 271D read with Section 269SS, and the issue of whether the penalty orders were time-barred. The Assessing Officer...

Penalty proceedings under CGST Act cannot be initiated after State GST Authorities have initiated proceedings on the same subject matter. Once proceedings are initiated...

Quick Updates: