Revision u/s 263 - Having proceeded to pass such erroneous order ...

High Court Reviews Erroneous Deduction Order u/s 263, Finds It Prejudicial to Revenue Interests.

March 26, 2014

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Revision u/s 263 - Having proceeded to pass such erroneous order with incomplete material particulars, giving deduction as claimed by the assessee is prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - Having proceeded to pass such erroneous order ...

High Court Reviews Erroneous Deduction Order u/s 263, Finds It Prejudicial to Revenue Interests.

March 26, 2014

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The phrase prejudicial to the interest of revenue has to be read in conjunction with an erroneous order passed by the A.O. Every loss of...

Validity of Revision u/s 263 - An order which is prejudicial to revenue even if no Tax Loss - The High Court found that the AO's assessment did not adequately address...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - An incorrect assumption of the fact or an incorrect application of law will satisfy the requirement of the order being erroneous. The phrase...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - profit attribution of a fixed place PE and the DAPE - Erroneous but not prejudicial to revenue order - Even if that computation of profit...

Revision u/s 263 - Every loss of revenue as a consequence of an order of AO cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interests of the revenue, for example, when an...

The Commissioner's invocation of Section 263 for revision of the assessment order was unjustified as the twin conditions of the order being erroneous and prejudicial to...

AO failed to examine details, relied solely on assessee's submissions, resulting in erroneous assessment prejudicial to Revenue's interests. Assessee borrowed...

Revision u/s 263 - The expression prejudicial to the interest of the revenue is of wide import and is not confined to merely loss of tax. - The term erroneous means a...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - We find that the assessment order qua the deduction under section 80(9)(2)(d) of the Act on account of interest earned from Surat Co-operative...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Total power subsidy and TUF subsidy were wrongly declared by the assessee - When AO adopted one of the courses permissible in law and it has...

Allowing the interest as deduction even though the films were not released during the year was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue – CIT has correctly...

The AO's order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue's interests. The filing fee for increasing share capital was rightly allowed as revenue expenditure,...

AO failed to conduct proper inquiries regarding genuineness of loan transactions for property acquisition. Bank statements revealed assessee lacked funds, payments made...

Revision u/s 263 - an order prejudicial and erroneous to the revenue - though the order passed by the A.O. is prejudicial to the interest of the revenue but it is not...

Revision u/s 263 - Erroneous or prejudicial of revenue - AO allowed the Exemption u/s. 10(34) - Insurance business - Dividend income - The order passed by the AO...

Quick Updates: