Benefit of exemption on HAR Cement, Refractories, Mortars & ...

Appellant Fails to Prove Refractory Materials Qualify for Machinery Exemption in Non-Conventional Energy Production.

March 28, 2014

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Benefit of exemption on HAR Cement, Refractories, Mortars & Concentrate, Prepared Refractory Bricks and Refractory Bricks - appellant has failed to prove that these items can be covered as parts of any machinery producing non-conventional energy device - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Benefit of exemption on HAR Cement, Refractories, Mortars & ...

Appellant Fails to Prove Refractory Materials Qualify for Machinery Exemption in Non-Conventional Energy Production.

March 28, 2014

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Doctrine of mutuality - Exemption from taxability - The doctrine of mutuality bestows a special status to qualify for exemption from tax liability. It is a settled...

Issue of benami property transactions and the appellant's failure to prove the source of income for acquiring properties worth Rs. 1,41,37,500/-. The Initiating Officer...

Refund claim rejected by adjudicating authority on grounds that services provided by appellant to SOLCIL did not qualify for exemption under Notification No. 25/2012-ST...

The appellant qualified as a non-resident in India during the previous year 2015-16. A non-resident is taxable in India only for income received/deemed to be received or...

HC allowed appeals, holding appellant's activities qualified as "relief of the poor" under Section 2(15) for charitable purpose definition and Section 11 exemption...

Depreciation on electric installations - to be classified as Furniture or Plant & Machinery - assessee failed to prove that electrical installations which are claimed to...

The appellant imported ELISA Test Kits for food testing but classified them under 3822 00 90 as diagnostic kits to claim exemption under customs notifications. The...

Smuggling - Betel Nuts - foreign origin goods - town seizure - notified item or not - onus to prove - The CESTAT recognized that betel nuts were not notified items under...

CESTAT NEW DELHI held that the appellant mis-declared quantity and quality, overvalued goods, and failed to comply with Advance Authorization requirements. Allegations...

The case pertains to service tax liability arising from the sale/transfer of a business as a going concern by way of slump sale under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The issue...

Input tax Credit - capital goods - The infrastructure is used for making outward supply of services; that the transformers, Network Grid, Cables etc. shall qualify as an...

Input tax credit - inputs / capital goods / input services - Solar Power Generating Plant of the applicant qualify as 'plant and machinery' as it falls under machinery -...

Review of customs duty exemptions - Extension of conditional exemption rates of BCD: The BCD exemption for specified goods covered under various serial numbers of...

Dishonor of Cheque - defendant failed to prove that plaintiff falls within the definition of ‘money-lender’ under the Act and also failed to prove that various recovery...

‘Consulting Engineering Services' - it is onus on the department to prove that the appellant has received this amount as “Consulting Engineering Firm” which the...

Quick Updates: