Onus to prove – the revenue has to prove the existence of a fact ...

Revenue Authority Must Prove Asset Undervaluation Before Burden Shifts to Taxpayer to Disprove Claim.

April 2, 2014

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Onus to prove – the revenue has to prove the existence of a fact that undervaluation of asset was made by the assessee - When that fact is proved, the burden shifts to the assessee to prove otherwise - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Onus to prove – the revenue has to prove the existence of a fact ...

Revenue Authority Must Prove Asset Undervaluation Before Burden Shifts to Taxpayer to Disprove Claim.

April 2, 2014

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Smuggling - foreign origin Gold - burden to prove - The tribunal clarified that the burden of proof under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962, solely rested on the...

Smuggling - Betel Nuts - foreign origin goods - town seizure - notified item or not - onus to prove - The CESTAT recognized that betel nuts were not notified items under...

Claim of second sale exemption and the imposition of penalty u/s 12(5)(iii). The High Court held that when the burden was on the dealer to prove the factum of second...

Import of foods of Malaysian origin - Benefit of Exemption under Preferential Trade Agreement - failure to prove the condition of qualifying value content of the goods...

Addition u/s. 68 being unsecured loans - onus to prove - The ITAT held that, primary onus can be discharged by establishing/furnishing the proof of the identity of the...

Addition u/s. 68 - allegation of accommodation entries taken by assessee - initial burden to prove - once the initial burden is discharged by the assessee the burden...

Smuggled goods - Burden of proof - Revenue cannot first show laxity in investigation and then seek to shift the burden to prove that the goods are not smuggled - AT

Valuation of imported goods - the onus of proving charge of undervaluation lies on the Revenue which needs to be proved by way of producing necessary evidence - the...

Valuation of imported goods - mis-declaration of goods - burden to prove - the burden which was on the respondent was never discharged and hence, there is no question of...

Addition u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE - assessment framed u/s 143(3) - amount being inheritance from his father by way of will - Burden to prove - where the assessee has...

Depreciation - plant and machinery could not be used during the year due to shifting / relocation of plant - Though, the unit could not generate revenue during the year...

Smuggling - Confiscation of gold / gold jewellery - burden to prove - on all the jewellery, there are no foreign markings and hence, there is no reasonable basis to...

Benami transactions - offence under Benami Act - onus of proving a benami transaction - after amendment, the onus of proving a benami transaction rests entirely on the...

Addition u/s 68 - genuineness and credit worthiness - It is evident that the assessee though has disclosed the source of the deposit but could not establish the nature...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - CIT upheld penalty - the onus of proving and disproving keeps on shifting as the proceedings are advanced. - AT

Quick Updates: