Imposition of penalties - u/s 112(a) - action is not covered ...

Case Laws Customs

May 3, 2014

Imposition of penalties - u/s 112(a) - action is not covered u/s 112(a) in as much as the importers or their employees never could have had a doubt that their goods are liable for confiscation, as the said goods were removed on BOE on which there was payment of duty - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalties - u/s 112(a) - action is not covered ...

Case Laws Customs

May 3, 2014

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 on an employee of the Customs Broker - classification of imported goods - The commissioner has recorded as finding...

CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

Imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) - employees of CHA - violation of import conditions - Goods diverted with his knowledge - The imposition of penalty on the Appellant,...

Imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act - Charge of abatement - Connivance between the employee of the CHA and importer - Illegal Import - prohibited goods -...

Imposition of penalties u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962 on Customs broker - import of used Multifunction Digital Photocopiers and Printers - it is alleged that the...

Imposition of penalty u/s 112 (a) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Who is the importer - No deponent has clearly mentioned that they were fully aware of the fact of the...

The case involved a penalty u/s 112(B) of the Customs Act, 1962 against an employee of a Customs House Agent (CHA) for allegedly concealing information affecting a bill...

Penalty u/s 112(a) of the CA, 1962 - Mis-declaration of goods - The goods stand absolutely confiscated without giving an option for redemption - The importer seems to...

Imposition of penalty u/s 114AA on Importer and u/s 112 (a) on CHA - the importer took the risk and moved the goods out of the LCS on his own, without listening the...

The key points are: misdeclaration of goods by the importer cannot render the Customs House Agent (CHA) vicariously liable for penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962....

Misdeclaration of imported goods - Bitumen - Country of Origin - Redemption fine - Levy of penalty - The department was well within its right to seize the goods for such...

Warehoused goods - warehousing period expired - goods (wine) was rendered unfit for human consumption - relinquishment to the title to goods - The appellant is not...

Imposition of penalty - section 112(b) of Customs Act - smuggling - diamonds - The active role of these Appellant, do not justify imposition of heavy penalty under...

Imposition of penalty u/s 112(b) of Customs Act, 1962 - goods were duly covered by prescribed job work documents and the same were also taken on record in the books of...

Imposition of penalty u/s 112 (d) and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 on Customs Broker - appellant was only a Customs Broker and not the importer - the only allegation...

Quick Updates: