Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2015 Year 2015 This

Penalty under Section 271D - violation of Section 269-SS - ...


High Court: Suspicion Alone Insufficient for Penalty u/s 271D; Thorough Investigation Required for Cash Loan Violations.

January 10, 2015

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

Penalty under Section 271D - violation of Section 269-SS - surrender of income - Receipt of Loan in cash - There is suspicion but this alone without further verification and investigation cannot justify the finding that the respondent-assessee had taken loan/deposit in cash. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty u/s 271D - violation of provisions u/s 269SS - cash receipt claimed as advance against sales - recording of the satisfaction by the AO is sine qua non for...

  2. HC ruled penalty proceedings under sections 271D and 271E require explicit satisfaction to be recorded by Assessing Officer during reassessment. Mere recording of...

  3. Penalty u/s 271D or 271E - Penalty u/s.271D or 271E of the Act is concerned, those are independent proceedings and having nothing to do with assessment proceedings or...

  4. The ITAT Delhi held that the levy of penalty u/s 271D without valid satisfaction for alleged violation u/s 269SS is not justified. The AO must record satisfaction in the...

  5. The High Court held that for levying penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS, the Assessing Officer must record satisfaction that the provisions were violated....

  6. The ITAT held that for penalty u/s 271D for contravention of section 269SS, recording satisfaction by AO is mandatory. Citing Jaya Laxmi Rice Mills case, it emphasized...

  7. Legality of SFIO Investigation - non-maintenance of the registered office at the address mentioned in Form No.10 - The High court found no statutory or legal impediment...

  8. Levy of penalties under various sections - The Appellate Tribunal, in a consolidated order, addressed several appeals concerning penalties imposed under various sections...

  9. Penalty levied u/s 271D for contravention of Section 269SS, which restricts cash transactions above a specified sum for immovable property. The key points are: The...

  10. Penalty u/s 271D - default u/s 269SS - assessee has taken loan from his father and paternal aunt, who are family members and such transactions would not attract penalty u/s 271D

  11. Penalty imposed u/s 271D & 271E - default u/s 269SS & 269T - CIT(A) deleted the penalty holding that general entries leading to assignment of debt does not attract...

  12. Penalty u/s 271D - accepting loan in cash - reasonable cause - the AO has neither doubted the impugned transaction nor any addition made in this behalf even under...

  13. Penalty u/s.271D & 271E - Period of limitation for imposing penalty u/s 275(1)(c) - he discussion by the AO in the assessment order and making reference to the Addl. CIT...

  14. The summary focuses on the interpretation and applicability of Section 271D and Section 269SS of the Income Tax Act. The key points are: Section 271D imposes a penalty...

  15. These guidelines instruct customs field formations on maintaining a balance between ease of doing business and investigating tax evasion cases related to import or...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates