Demand of VAT on the invisible loss of yarn emerging during ...

Court Rules VAT on Yarn Loss Unjust; Manufacturer Must Prove Loss Extent, Case Remanded for Review.

April 28, 2015

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

Demand of VAT on the invisible loss of yarn emerging during manufacturing process - Assessing Officers were not justified in adopting uniform percentage as invisible loss and calling upon the dealer to reverse the refund/input tax credit availed to that extent - it is the onus upon the manufacturer to prove the loss / waste - matter remanded back - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Demand of VAT on the invisible loss of yarn emerging during ...

Court Rules VAT on Yarn Loss Unjust; Manufacturer Must Prove Loss Extent, Case Remanded for Review.

April 28, 2015

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

You may also like:

The High Court considered the maintainability of a review petition based on a subsequent judgment and the condonation of a 619-day delay in filing the civil review...

In the matter under review, the High Court dismissed the review petitions filed by the parties. The Court held that no grounds were established for seeking a review of...

The adjudicating authority is bound to explain the alleged contraventions to the person proceeded against or their legal representatives. Rule 4(4) mandates...

A review application is maintainable on (i) discovery of new and important evidence which could not be produced earlier despite due diligence, (ii) mistake or error...

The High Court considered a case involving refund of accumulated credit due to inverted tax structure u/s 54(3) Proviso and Rule 89(5) of CGST Rules. The court held that...

The review petition challenges the order imposing interest liability over the withheld amount and cost on the Managing Director. The court held that reviewing an order...

Scope of the order pursuant to remand back of the matter - Refund of Excess Duty paid - The Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) has travelled beyond the remand order passed by...

Power of tribunal to review application - It is the well laid down proposition of law that ‘in the absence of any power of ‘Review’ or ‘Recall’ vested with the...

HC dismissed the review petition against its order that had remitted the case for fresh assessment. The court found no grounds for review as the original order was based...

HC dismissed the review petition challenging pre-deposit requirements with Rs.10,000/- costs. The petition failed on procedural and substantive grounds. The Advocate's...

Application of Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - There is no percentage fixed in the Cenvat Credit Rules to decide that if dutiable goods are much below that...

The High Court addressed the power to grant exemptions u/s 8(5)(b) of the CST Act, ruling that it extends beyond "registered dealers" to include other specified...

Review petition - Validity of reopening of assessment - The High Court dismissed the review petitions seeking to challenge a common order dated 04.11.2022, which set...

Doctrine of Merger of High Court Decision with the Order of Supreme Court - The Jharkhand High Court, in its analysis, delved into the doctrine of merger, a pivotal...

Remission of Central Excise Duty - The tribunal found Rule 21 inapplicable, as it pertains to goods lost or destroyed before clearance from the factory, not to loss of...

Quick Updates: