Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2015 Year 2015 This

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee withdrew its claim of deduction ...

Case Laws     Income Tax

June 27, 2015

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee withdrew its claim of deduction us/ 80IB of the Act before initiation of assessment proceedings - we disagree with the conclusion of the AO that the assessee had furnished either inaccurate particulars of income or submitted wrong statement of its income - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - weighted deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) claimed in the original return and later in the return filed in response to notice u/s 148 of the Act,...

  2. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering...

  3. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

  4. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - claim of incorrect deduction u/s 80GGA - The Appellate Tribunal analyzed the timeline of events and noted that the assessee had...

  5. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee had sold a plot of land in respect of which deduction u/s 54B claimed - withdrawal of deduction u/s 54B - merely because the assessee...

  6. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee in this case has never revised its return during the period prescribed u/s 139(1) rather withdrew the claim during assessment...

  7. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) for disallowing deductions u/ss 54EC and 54F. Assessee admitted and withdrew incorrect claim u/s 54EC, constituting furnishing of...

  8. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 35 - AO has not brought out his case as to why penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act...

  9. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed for denying deduction u/s 80DD for a disabled person with over 80% disability. The assessee, a retired individual, had submitted...

  10. This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

  11. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - deduction u/s. 80GGC denied - second round of appeal - the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the claim for deduction was...

  12. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Making an incorrect claim in law cannot tantamount to furnishing inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere making of a...

  13. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee has made a claim, which is one of the arguable claims, but assessee in its own wisdom, withdrawn that claim During the course of...

  14. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - after learning about the serious irregularities in the activities of the aforesaid institute, acted in a bonafide manner, and in his return filed...

  15. The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates