Penalty u/s 78(5) - Evasion of duty - Mens rea - once there is ...

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax

August 31, 2015

Penalty u/s 78(5) - Evasion of duty - Mens rea - once there is a clear cut admission by the assessee himself that the bill was prepared later on, it was a clear cut case of evasion of tax and the penalty - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 78(5) - Evasion of duty - Mens rea - once there is ...

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax

August 31, 2015

You may also like:

Imposition of penalty - The mens rea is not required to be proved as necessary ingredient for imposition of penalty under sub-section (5) of Section 78, on proving...

Levy of penalty - non filling up of Part 'B' of the e-Way Bill - existence of mens rea or not The High Court referenced a specific case and highlighted that the issue of...

Mere failure to carry the prescribed declaration form duly filled in is liable for penalty as per provisions of Section 78 (5) of the RST Act, and there is no need to...

Detention of goods on onward journey - detention on ground goods dispatched to different place than mentioned in documents - levy of penalty u/s 129 of UPGST Act -...

Levy of penalty - mens rea in evasion of tax - It is well settled that by merely using the expression “mens rea”, it would not amount to concluding that there was a...

If there is no mens rea, no mandatory penalty u/s 11AC - SC

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Finance Bill, 2015 - service tax - Substantial overall in levy of penalty u/s 76 and 78

Levy of penalty u/s 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - appellant had collected ocean freight charges from their clients at a marked up value - The Revenue has erred in...

Levy of penalty u/s 54(1)(2) of the U.P. VAT Act, 2008 - men-rea - The Court concluded that mens rea is indeed an essential prerequisite for imposing a penalty under...

Importer imported footwear and evaded duty by deliberately claiming lesser IGST rate, violating N/N. 1/2017 which mandated mentioning sale price on footwear to claim...

The High Court quashed penalty u/s E-Way Bill violation, classifying goods as ODC due to speed without intent to evade tax. Relying on precedent, mens rea is essential...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Default by assessee - mens rea is not an essential element for imposing penalty for non compliance of notices issued by AO - penalty confirmed - AT

Laible for penalty on delayed service tax or not – penalty under section 78 - there should be a mens rea on the part of the appellant to evade tax – there is no...

Levy of penalty - there is no mens rea or any premediated thought in non-complying with the statutory requirements, as no duty was actually payable upon import, being...

Quick Updates: