Imposition of penalty - Malafide intention - it is not the ...

Penalty Waived for Appellant in Service Tax Case; Consultant's Fraud Cited u/s 78, No Malafide Intent Found.

November 11, 2015

Case Laws Service Tax AT

Imposition of penalty - Malafide intention - it is not the appellant who has committed an offence of non payment of service tax, it is the consultant, who has defrauded them therefore there is reasonable cause for waiver of penalty under Section 78 - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalty - Malafide intention - it is not the ...

Penalty Waived for Appellant in Service Tax Case; Consultant's Fraud Cited u/s 78, No Malafide Intent Found.

November 11, 2015

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/s 78 of FA - Since the elements of fraud, mis-statement or suppression of facts etc. with an intent to evade service tax are not present in the matter...

Services rendered by appellant classified as works contract services, attracting service tax liability. Appellant failed to obtain service tax registration and pay...

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

Penalty u/s 70, 77 and 78 of FA - non-filing of ST-3 return would not amount to suppression of facts, with intent to defraud Government revenue, unless it is...

Penalty u/s 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, cannot be imposed simultaneously with penalty u/s 76 for the same offense. The decision in Nizam Sugar Factory case applies to...

The High Court quashed penalty u/s E-Way Bill violation, classifying goods as ODC due to speed without intent to evade tax. Relying on precedent, mens rea is essential...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Levy of penalty - in case of confirmation of demand u/s 73(A) there is no application of Section 76 and 78 for imposition of penalty. Therefore, the adjudicating...

Finance Bill, 2015 - service tax - Substantial overall in levy of penalty u/s 76 and 78

Penalty u/s 76, 77 and 78 of FA - No malafide can be attributed to the respondent, who is organized under Government of India - No penalty.

Penalty - ignorance of law - misguidance by the Consultant - ignorance of law is enough to set-aside penalty under Section 76, 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - AT

Imposition of penalty u/s 78 - mere non-payment of short-payment of duties or taxes cannot be construed as with an intent to evade duties/taxes. There must be something...

Penalty u/s 77 & 78 - it is not the appellant who has committed an offence of non payment of service tax, it is the consultant, who has defrauded them therefore there is...

Levy of penalty u/s 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - No independent reasons have been given by the first appellate authority to confirm the penalty under Section 78 of the...

Dispute regarding non-payment/short payment of service tax, tax demand and interest u/ss 73(2) and 75, penalties u/ss 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and extended...

Quick Updates: