Benefit of SSI Notification denied - denial of claim for period ...

Case Laws Central Excise

October 15, 2016

Benefit of SSI Notification denied - denial of claim for period of 26 days i.e., during 1.4.2002 to 26.4.2002 - the policy of the Government of exempting the subject item from duty has been consistent, which becomes clear from the wordings of the clarificatory Notification No.26/2002-CX - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Benefit of SSI Notification denied - denial of claim for period ...

Case Laws Central Excise

October 15, 2016

You may also like:

Denial of SSI Exemption - benefit of Notification No.9/2001 - goods falling under Chapter 93 were excluded from the scope of SSI benefit during the relevant period - ...

Penalty - Bogus invoice issued without selling the goods – penalty would be attracted under Rule 25 (1) (d) as well as Rule 26(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - AT

The appellant sought lapse of the attachment order u/s 5(1) and (3) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, questioning the legality of the order issued in...

Anti Dumping Duty - When the object of both the paragraphs of the policy is looked into, that brings out difference between the two. Paragraph 4.1.1 deals with normal...

Rebate claim – Non-submission of original and duplicate copy of ARE-1 under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 r.w Notification No. 19/2004 - rebate denied - CGOVT

Denial of Refund claim – Availment of benefit of Notification No.41/07-ST & Notification no.17/09-ST – Computation of period of limitation for different periods and...

Levy of penalty u/r 26(1) for abatement - it is clear that all the appellants were indulged in abating the manufacturer for fraudulent availment of Cenvat credit...

Denial of rebate claim - Area based exemption - goods were manufactured by a manufacturer who has availed benefit of Notification No.39/01-CE(NT) - benefit of rebate...

Denial of SSI benefit - cakes and pastries supplied to customers under the brand name assigned by the other brand name owner - SSI benefit cannot be denied - AT

Penalty under Rule 26(1) of Central excise rules 2002 - Bogus Cenvatable invoices issued - the appellant was liable to pay penalty - AT

The Commission perused the material and public domain information. The Informant alleged unfair and discriminatory interest rate hikes, frequent increases, and...

Disallowance u/s 37(1) - interest paid by the assessee u/s 30(4) of the MVAT Act, 2002 is penal in nature as it has its germane to infraction of law by the dealer while...

Penalty u/r 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - appellant was Director during relevant period - Since the demand of the duty has already been settled under SVLDRS...

Assessment of turnover of the applicant as per Section 4(3) of the VAT - levy of tax on turnover of sale has to be done in the manner provided in Section 4(3) of the Act...

Attachment of property - expiry of period of limitation for filing appeal - There is no scope to interpret the provisions contained in Section 8(4) and Section 26 of the...

Quick Updates: