Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2017 Year 2017 This

Mere reference to paragraphs numbers of the Final Findings ex ...


Court Rules Citing Paragraphs Insufficient for Reasoned Orders; Detailed Judicial Reasoning Required for Compliance.

April 18, 2017

Case Laws     Customs     HC

Mere reference to paragraphs numbers of the Final Findings ex facie does not satisfy the requirements of passing a reasoned order. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Validity of provisional attachment order - benefit of Input Tax Credit availed from invoices issued from non-existing firms - It observes that the impugned order lacks...

  2. The main order rejecting condonation of delay lacks reasons, violating principles of natural justice. It is a well-settled legal position that an affidavit-in-reply...

  3. The court quashed the impugned orders rejecting the appeal as the appellate authority failed to assign any reasons, violating principles of natural justice. It is...

  4. Automatic Vacation of the interim order / Stay Order after six months - judicial legislation or not - The Supreme Court held that interim orders cannot automatically...

  5. The High Court quashed the summary order issued under the GST Act without a detailed order, finding it a violation of principles of natural justice. The court observed...

  6. Reasoned Order - Exemption of Duty – Reasons are a soul of any judicial order and good and proper reasoning makes its body strong - Court remands the matter back to Tribunal - HC

  7. Judicial Discipline - Seeking refund of accumulated Cenvat credit - input services or not - The department had not accepted the judgement in the case of Paul Merchants...

  8. The order cancelling petitioner's registration was passed without assigning any reasons, violating court precedents mandating reasons as the heart and soul of judicial...

  9. Condonation of delay in filing income tax return (ITR) - Rejection of application made u/s 119(2)(b) - The High court found that the PCIT's order lacked reasoning and...

  10. The adjudicating authority is bound to explain the alleged contraventions to the person proceeded against or their legal representatives. Rule 4(4) mandates...

  11. The High Court quashed the Commissioner's order for provisional attachment u/s 83(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 due to lack of reasons recorded. The...

  12. The CESTAT dismissed an appeal for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982, after multiple adjournments exceeded the statutory maximum of three....

  13. HC determined the cancellation of GST registration invalid due to procedural deficiencies. The show cause notice (SCN) merely cited Rule 21(b) of CGST Rules 2017 without...

  14. The Madras High Court considered the issue of personal hearing notice u/s FEMA 1999. The Court held that Rule 4(3) does not require the reasoned opinion to be...

  15. The High Court examined whether proper show cause notices were issued before passing impugned orders u/s 73(9) of the State GST Act. It held that the summary of show...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates