AO having failed to record his satisfaction while initiating ...

Case Laws Income Tax

April 25, 2017

AO having failed to record his satisfaction while initiating proceedings for imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) as to which limb of the provisions of section 271(1)(c) is attracted, the order imposing penalty is invalid - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

AO having failed to record his satisfaction while initiating ...

Case Laws Income Tax

April 25, 2017

You may also like:

The assessment u/s 153C mandates the recording of satisfaction by the Assessing Officer (AO) upon discovery of material likely to "have a bearing on the determination of...

Penalty u/s 271D - violation of provisions u/s 269SS - cash receipt claimed as advance against sales - recording of the satisfaction by the AO is sine qua non for...

The ITAT held that for penalty u/s 271D for contravention of section 269SS, recording satisfaction by AO is mandatory. Citing Jaya Laxmi Rice Mills case, it emphasized...

Revision u/s 263 - penalty proceedings u/s 271AAB(1A) - The mandate under section 263 of the Act do not give any power to CIT to impose his satisfaction over the...

The Appellate Tribunal held that the assessment orders issued u/s 153C for the assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13 were beyond the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non recording of satisfaction - When satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act is recorded by the AO in...

Levy of penalties u/s 271D and 271E for the violation of sections 269SS and 269T, respectively - The Tribunal, after reviewing precedents from the Supreme Court and...

Revision u/s 263 - AO did not initiate penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1) (c) - No hesitation in holding that the CIT is not correct in assuming jurisdiction u/s 263 of the...

The ITAT Delhi held that the levy of penalty u/s 271D without valid satisfaction for alleged violation u/s 269SS is not justified. The AO must record satisfaction in the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - AO has not applied his mind before initiating the penalty proceedings rather borrowed his satisfaction from the “tax...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied by the Assessing Officer solely based on the order of the Income Tax Settlement Commission withdrawing immunity from penalty and...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The Assessing Officer has to record satisfaction before initiating penalty proceedings and the penalty proceedings are subject to...

Validity of Initiation of proceedings u/s 153C - as argued satisfaction note of the searched person and satisfaction note of the petitioner (other than the searched...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - in the assessment order, AO has made it clear that penalty proceedings are initiated separately for furnishing...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - recording of satisfaction - mere direction in the assessment order to initiate penalty proceedings - Concealment/furnishing inaccurate...

Quick Updates: