Since it was the choice of the assessee as to whether to file an ...

Case Laws Income Tax

July 28, 2017

Since it was the choice of the assessee as to whether to file an objection before the DRP or to pursue the normal channel of filing appeal against the assessment order before the ld. CIT(A). Therefore, the appeal filed by the assessee before the ld. CIT(A) was maintainable.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Since it was the choice of the assessee as to whether to file an ...

Case Laws Income Tax

July 28, 2017

You may also like:

Assessment order passed u/s 144C(2) - The assessee did not file the objections before the DRP within the prescribed time and therefore, the objections are not...

Provisional attachment of goods - bogus invoices - writ court granted relief to the respondent - as on date, the respondent have not complied with the order passed by...

The High Court ruled on the validity of an order passed u/s 144C(3) read with Section 144B. The petitioner had filed objections to the Draft Assessment Order before the...

Validity of assessment order u/s 144C - petitioner filed objection to the draft assessment order well within the time of thirty days before the DRP - The High Court held...

The case involves the validity of a final assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s 144(C)(3) beyond the period of limitation. The Dispute Resolution...

Right of department to file any appeal or cross-objections before the Commissioner (Appeals) against Refund order - the Department could neither have filed an appeal...

Non consideration of objections to the draft assessment order u/s 144 - since the objections were well within time, the action of the AO in proceeding with the final...

Maintainability of appeal before the CIT(A) u/s 246A - interlocutory order disposing off objections filed by assessee against reopening of the concluded assessment u/s...

Condonation of delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) - delay of 1950 days’ in filing the appeal - There is no quarrel on the point if the assessee has chosen a...

Validity of assessment order passed u/s 144C - due to oversight/inadvertence Petitioner did not inform the AO within 30 days period prescribed under Sub-section (2) of...

The monetary limit of ₹ 10 lakhs for filing appeals before the ITAT would apply equally to cross objections under section 253(4) of the Act. Cross objections below...

AO had no jurisdiction to frame the final assessment order on 27.01.2020 u/s. 144(3) of the Act, since he was divested of jurisdiction to pass final order between...

The assessment order passed u/s 144C(3) was beyond the prescribed period of one month from the end of the month in which the period for filing objections u/s 144C(2)...

Validity of reopening assessment challenged due to non-disposal of objections raised by assessee against reassessment. Deduction u/s 24(a) proposed to be disallowed....

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid as AO reopened with non-application of mind and higher authorities granted approval u/s 151 mechanically without verifying...

Quick Updates: