The addition confirmed u/s 68 as unexplained credit instead of ...

Taxpayer's Section 68 Addition Deleted: Documentary Evidence Proves Source, Identity, and Genuineness of Transaction.

March 21, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The addition confirmed u/s 68 as unexplained credit instead of long term capital gain as claimed by the assessee - however, the source identity and genuineness of the transaction having been established by documentary evidences - Additions deleted - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

The addition confirmed u/s 68 as unexplained credit instead of ...

Taxpayer's Section 68 Addition Deleted: Documentary Evidence Proves Source, Identity, and Genuineness of Transaction.

March 21, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Non-proving identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of share premium received cannot be treated as unexplained income if sufficient documentary evidence is provided....

The assessee successfully discharged the onus u/s 68 regarding share capital introduced by the company director, a major shareholder, proving identity, creditworthiness,...

In a case concerning unexplained credit u/s 68, the assessee proved the identity and genuineness of share applicants, although their creditworthiness was questioned. The...

Unexplained share capital and premium received by assessee company was its own unaccounted money flowing back in form of premium on share allotment. Assessee filed...

Key legal issues and the Tribunal's holdings: Agricultural land sold by assessee situated beyond municipal limits cannot be treated as capital asset u/s 2(14). Addition...

The ITAT held: Long term capital gain was to be computed allowing deduction for indexed cost of acquisition and exemption u/s 54B. Addition u/s 68 for unexplained...

Addition u/s 68 - whether an assessee who has taken a loan is bound to produce the source of source? - Held No - The appellant having proved the identity and credit...

The assessee's contentions were upheld by the Tribunal regarding various additions made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal ruled that the RTGS transfer from the...

The ITAT Surat held that disallowance of business loss on sale of securities as LTCG in penny stocks was unjustified. The AO failed to provide evidence of collusive...

Addition u/s 68 - onus to prove the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the share applicants - Both the nature & source of the share application received was...

Addition u/s 68 - Unexplained cash deposits - Provision to section 68 inserted w.e.f. 1.4.2013 requires the assessee to prove the source of source. This proviso shall...

Addition u/s. 68 being unsecured loans - onus to prove - The ITAT held that, primary onus can be discharged by establishing/furnishing the proof of the identity of the...

Assessment of trust - addition being loans from three parties - It is well settled Law that assessee need not to prove source of the source. A.O. entirely on different...

Addition u/s 68 - unexplained cash credits - Onus to prove - CIT(A) deleted addition - The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to discharge its onus of proving the...

The assessee made investments in two firms by purchasing cold storage units funded by M/s. A.R. Constructions, where the assessee is a managing partner. The source for...

Quick Updates: