Penalty u/s 271D for violation of provisions of section 269SS - ...

Case Laws Income Tax

March 24, 2018

Penalty u/s 271D for violation of provisions of section 269SS - Even if it is assumed that the assessing officer has issued a notice u/s 271D on the date of assessment order, i.e., on 31-12-2008, the same would become time barred by 30-06-2009, i.e., within six months from the end of the month in which action for imposition of penalty is initiated - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271D for violation of provisions of section 269SS - ...

Case Laws Income Tax

March 24, 2018

You may also like:

The High Court held that for levying penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS, the Assessing Officer must record satisfaction that the provisions were violated....

Penalty u/s 271D - violation of provisions u/s 269SS - cash receipt claimed as advance against sales - recording of the satisfaction by the AO is sine qua non for...

The case involved a challenge to penalty orders u/ss 271D and 271E before the Appellate Tribunal. The issue revolved around the reassessment proceedings being quashed,...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - non-issue of a notice u/s 143(2) - The Circular reinforces the position that it is sine qua non for the Assessing Officer to assume...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Assessing Officer to usurp the jurisdiction to reopen the assessment - The first Assessing Officer has made the reassessment after...

Penalty u/s 272A(2)(g) was levied for not issuing TDS certificates in Form 16A to deductees on time. The issue pertained to the period of limitation for issuing the...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee had failed to provide full submissions - penalty levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(b) of the IT Act deserves to be...

AO initiated the penalty u/s 271E for violation of sec. 269TT, but levied penalty u/s 271D for violation of the provisions of sec. 269SS. From this conduct of the AO, it...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. It was questioned whether a precise charge was brought against the assessee and if the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied by the Assessing Officer solely based on the order of the Income Tax Settlement Commission withdrawing immunity from penalty and...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Once a query has been raised by Assessing Officer through the assessment proceeding and the assessee has responded to that query, it...

Revision u/s 263 - When the provision contained under Section 92CA(4) of the Act makes it mandatory upon the Assessing Officer to compute the total income of the...

Penalty u/s 271D - accepting loan in cash - reasonable cause - the AO has neither doubted the impugned transaction nor any addition made in this behalf even under...

Penalty u/s 270A was imposed by disallowing 30% of indexed cost of development expenses concerning Long Term Capital Gain offered by the assessee due to failure to...

The ITAT Delhi held that the levy of penalty u/s 271D without valid satisfaction for alleged violation u/s 269SS is not justified. The AO must record satisfaction in the...

Quick Updates: