Bogus LTCG - the assessee was not allowed cross-examination of ...

Case Laws Income Tax

January 19, 2019

Bogus LTCG - the assessee was not allowed cross-examination of the maker of the statement therefore, the statement of the persons cannot be used against the assessee for making addition u/s. 68.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Bogus LTCG - the assessee was not allowed cross-examination of ...

Case Laws Income Tax

January 19, 2019

You may also like:

Bogus LTCG - exemption u/s 10(38) on sale of shares denied - During the appellate proceedings, the assessee was not made available any such statement and even the right...

The Assessee, a regular investor in shares, made investments and sold a particular script when prices were high, resulting in Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG). The...

Violation of principles of natural justice - opportunity for cross-examination. Evidentiary value of statements recorded u/s 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 cannot be...

Violation of principles of natural justice - denial of cross-examination - revocation of customs broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposed by...

Seeking cross-examination of two persons whose statements were relied upon while issuing the SCN - Cross-examination allowed - HC

This case pertains to an alleged offense under FEMA involving bogus purported exports with inflated invoices to obtain export benefits, where the goods never reached the...

Denial of cross-examination process of witness - ACIT restricted cross examination process by denying the questions asked by the Petitioner during cross examination -...

Assessment u/s 153A - addition on account of interest paid by the assessee on unsecured loans - The only reason for making and upholding the disallowance of the interest...

Unexplained cash payment made by the assessee relating to the admission of his son into P.G. medical course under management quota - the addition is based on the...

Validity of reassessment order u/s 147 - Denial of Cross-Examination Opportunity - Reliance of statement of third party - The High Court noted that the petitioner did...

The High Court addressed a case involving a violation of natural justice principles due to the rejection of the petitioner's request for cross-examination in a matter...

Clandestine Removal - statements recorded by Revenue - The Commissioner has clearly ignored this findings and come to a difference conclusion. While doing so he is...

Clandestine removal demand based on electrical consumption was challenged. Average electricity consumption for certain periods was calculated. Cross-examination of...

The case pertains to the allegation of clandestine manufacture and clearance of structural items/rolled products by the appellant. The revenue's case rested solely on...

Assessment u/s 153A - admission made u/s 132(4) - The fundamental difference between evidentiary value of statement under S. 132(4) against the maker of statement...

Quick Updates: