The burden of proving that the movement of goods was occasioned ...

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax

January 19, 2019

The burden of proving that the movement of goods was occasioned not by reason of sale is on the dealer and to discharge this burden he must furnish to the assessing authority a declaration duly filled by the principal officer of the other place of business of the dealer along with the evidence of despatch of such goods.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The burden of proving that the movement of goods was occasioned ...

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax

January 19, 2019

You may also like:

Claim of second sale exemption and the imposition of penalty u/s 12(5)(iii). The High Court held that when the burden was on the dealer to prove the factum of second...

Time bound supply scheme - branch transfers - interstate sales - While the Assessee has discharged its initial burden of showing that the transaction was only a branch...

The central issue revolved around whether the movement of goods from manufacturing units in Rajasthan to depots in Bihar and Jharkhand constituted inter-state supply of...

Genuineness of Stock transfer against Form F of CST - the initial burden of proof is on the dealer to show that the movement has occasioned by reason of transfer of such...

Input Tax Credit (ITC) - Genuineness - Onus to prove - Mere production of the invoices or the payment made by cheques is not enough and cannot be said to be discharging...

Validity of input tax credit (ITC) u/s 16 of the UP GST Act hinges on compliance with specified conditions to avoid double taxation. The burden lies on the dealer to...

Local sale or Central Sale - works contract in the course of interstate sale - It is not necessary that the sale must precede the inter-State movement in order that the...

Refund of Excess ITR certified by the Auditor - Input Tax Rebate (ITR) - u/s 15, the burden of proving that any sale or purchase effected by a dealer is not liable to...

Sale of scooters to dealer against Form III-A - the sale letters in Forms 20-21 issued by the assessee itself, prove that it had sold the goods to the consumers as,...

Smuggling - gold bullion of foreign origin - notified goods or not - burden to prove - The appellants have sufficiently discharged their burden of proof in terms of...

Levy of CST - sales in the course of import or inter-State sales - The High Court was right in observing that once the appellant got released the goods after filing the...

Smuggling - foreign origin Gold - burden to prove - The tribunal clarified that the burden of proof under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962, solely rested on the...

Valuation of imported goods - mis-declaration of goods - burden to prove - the burden which was on the respondent was never discharged and hence, there is no question of...

Benami transactions - offence under Benami Act - onus of proving a benami transaction - after amendment, the onus of proving a benami transaction rests entirely on the...

Confiscation - Smuggling of Betel Nuts - discharge of burden to prove u/s 123 of Customs Act - The betel nut is not notified under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962...

Quick Updates: