Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of interest expenditure - ...

Interest Expenditure Disallowance: Findings May Justify Under Sec 271(1)(c), But Insufficient for Penalty Imposition Alone.

February 16, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of interest expenditure - The findings of the AO may be sufficient to make disallowance in quantum on the theory of preponderance of probabilities but it is not sufficient to fasten and saddle the assessee with penalty provisions as are enshrined u/s. 271(1)(c)

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of interest expenditure - ...

Interest Expenditure Disallowance: Findings May Justify Under Sec 271(1)(c), But Insufficient for Penalty Imposition Alone.

February 16, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance of interest expenditure under section 43B as well as disallowance export product development expenses - Just because the assessee...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance u/s 40 (a)(ia) only for lack of payment of TDS while the payment was bonafide - Though the failure on the part of the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - merely for the reason that the said expenditure was claimed as a revenue expenditure would not justify imposition of penalty under Sec....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when the assessee company had been assessed to tax under the deeming provisions of Sec. 115JB of the Act, therefore, on the basis of our...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases by applying the profit rate - Once there is no reason to disbelieve the sales made by the assessee and...

Penalty 271(1)(c) - deduction of interest out of ‘income from other sources’ - The AO has admitted the claim of interest expenditure to the extent of interest income and...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

MAT - Adjustments to book profit - Disallowance as per the clause (f) to Explanation-1 of Sec. 115JB of the Act independently - there is no mechanism provided under the...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - A.O had clearly failed to discharge his statutory obligation of fairly putting the assessee to notice as regards the defaults for which he was...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Non specification of charge - defective notice - as the A.O had clearly failed to discharge his statutory obligation of fairly putting the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non comply with notice u/s 142(1) - the failure of the assessee to comply with such notice cannot be said to be a default which may justify the...

Penalty being 300% by invoking Section 271(1)(c) - return was revised before completion of assessment - Revenue is not justified in imposing penalty under Section 271(1)(c) - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - such provision of services and it subsequent revision may result in disallowance of the expenditure but certainly it cannot lead to levy of...

The ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not imposable on the assessee. The assessee had voluntarily paid tax on income from sale of shares three years prior to...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - for such lump-sum disallowance out of wages on the basis of presumption, no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is leviable - AT

Quick Updates: