Tribunal was justified in correcting its mistake in exercise of ...

Case Laws Income Tax

August 10, 2012

Tribunal was justified in correcting its mistake in exercise of its jurisdiction u/s 254(2) as a patent, manifest and self-evident error which does not require elaborate discussion of evidence or arguments to establish it - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Tribunal was justified in correcting its mistake in exercise of ...

Case Laws Income Tax

August 10, 2012

You may also like:

The Tribunal does not have power to review its judgment under Section 254(2) of the Act, which authorises the Tribunal to only correct its mistakes - HC

The Tribunal held that in a case involving a requisition u/s 132A of the Act, the jurisdiction to complete the assessment is governed by the provisions of Section 153A....

Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - If such prayer is allowed then in every case, where the assessee is not satisfied with the finding of the Tribunal, the MA will be...

Rectification of mistake u/s 254(2) - mistake of making an incorrect statement by AR - Order of tribunal was passed relying statement - argument advanced by said counsel...

Rectification u/s 254 - non consideration of certain grounds - there is an inadvertent mistake by the Tribunal in not disposing of grounds no.2, 3 and 6, which comes...

Rectification u/s 254 - No mistake, much less, a mistake apparent on the face of record as envisaged under section 254(2) of the Act. What the assessee wants by filing...

Tribunal held that an order passed following binding precedents cannot be recalled or reviewed based on a subsequent contrary judgment of a higher court. Once an order...

Rectification u/s 254 - The High Court acknowledges that the Tribunal is the final authority to ascertain facts. However, it must rectify any apparent mistakes in its...

Rectification of mistake u/s. 254(2) - Scope of tribunal in rectification - review of the order passed by the Tribunal in the guise of rectification which is not...

Rectification u/s mistake u/s 254 - apparent mistake in the order of Tribunal warranting rectification - scope of section 254(2) is limited to rectification of mistake...

Rectification of mistake - issue of limitation was not considered - Tribunal was correct in exercising its jurisdiction u/s 35C(2) of the Act and correct its mistake by...

Rectification u/s 254(2) - receipt from other advertisers towards sale of online ad space in Inida under AdWord Program is chargeable to tax as 'Royalty - issue is...

The jurisdictional Assessing Officer (AO) had suo moto transferred the assessment to Income Tax Officer (ITO), Ward 2(2) Noida. The appellant contended that the...

Tribunal apparently fell into an error in not rectifying the said mistake apparent on the face of record, which is nothing more than a mistake of fact and even if it is...

Rectification u/s 254 - non consideration of the Judgment of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court - When the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to review the order passed by them,...

Quick Updates: