Tribunal was justified in correcting its mistake in exercise of ...

Tribunal Corrects Self-Evident Error u/s 254(2); No Detailed Evidence or Argument Needed.

August 10, 2012

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Tribunal was justified in correcting its mistake in exercise of its jurisdiction u/s 254(2) as a patent, manifest and self-evident error which does not require elaborate discussion of evidence or arguments to establish it - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Tribunal was justified in correcting its mistake in exercise of ...

Tribunal Corrects Self-Evident Error u/s 254(2); No Detailed Evidence or Argument Needed.

August 10, 2012

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The Tribunal held that in a case involving a requisition u/s 132A of the Act, the jurisdiction to complete the assessment is governed by the provisions of Section 153A....

Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - failure to consider an argument advanced by either party for arriving at a conclusion is not an error apparent on the record, although...

Rectification u/s 254 - The High Court acknowledges that the Tribunal is the final authority to ascertain facts. However, it must rectify any apparent mistakes in its...

The Tribunal does not have power to review its judgment under Section 254(2) of the Act, which authorises the Tribunal to only correct its mistakes - HC

The HC declined to entertain the petition challenging the Tribunal's decision under Section 254(2) regarding TP adjustment for guarantee fees paid to an Associated...

Rectification u/s 254 - non consideration of Tribunal decision in order which was referred and provided in paper book - an apparent error requiring necessary...

Rectification of mistake u/s 254(2) - mistake of making an incorrect statement by AR - Order of tribunal was passed relying statement - argument advanced by said counsel...

Rectification of mistake - if according to the assessee, the order of the ITAT needs to be visited again or the evidences submitted need re-appreciation again in light...

The HC held that the Tribunal erred in exercising jurisdiction u/s 254(2) to set aside the additions made by the AO regarding delayed payment of statutory dues like PF...

ITAT recalled its earlier order due to discovery of inadvertent errors, specifically the reliance on non-existing case laws identified during suo-moto review. Exercising...

Tribunal held that an order passed following binding precedents cannot be recalled or reviewed based on a subsequent contrary judgment of a higher court. Once an order...

Rectification u/s 254(2) - one of ground was not disposed - since the appeal against the order of the Tribunal has already been admitted and a substantial question of...

Rectification of mistake u/s. 254(2) - Scope of tribunal in rectification - review of the order passed by the Tribunal in the guise of rectification which is not...

Rectification u/s 254 - error apparent on face of record - non-disposal of specific ground raised in the grounds of appeal is an error within the meaning of 254(2) -...

The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case regarding rectification u/s 254 related to Compensation under BTALA. The Tribunal found the applicant's attempt for...

Quick Updates: