Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
IBC - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2020 Year 2020 This

Rule of IRP - A well functioning system of resolution driven by ...

Case Laws     Insolvency and Bankruptcy

September 22, 2020

Rule of IRP - A well functioning system of resolution driven by the IPs enables the adjudicator to delegate more and more powers and duties to the professionals. This creates the positive externality of better utilization of judicial time. The worse the performance of IPs, the more the adjudicator may need to personally supervise the process, which in turn may cause inordinate delays. Consumers in a well functioning market for IPs are likely to have greater trust in the overall insolvency resolution system. On the other hand, poor quality, services and recurring instances of malpractice and fraud, erode consumer trust. - Tri

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The case involves an appeal before CESTAT regarding continuation post Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under IBC, 2016. NCLT approved a Resolution Plan...

  2. Scope of NCLT Rules - fees mentioned in Rule 112 read with the definition clause 2(12) does not mention either CIRP costs or the fees to be paid to the IRP or RP. The...

  3. Replacement of the Appellant with another Resolution Professional - When the Resolution has been passed by the CoC in accordance with the provisions of the IBC deciding...

  4. The Appellate Tribunal found the Interim Resolution Professional's (IRP) conduct to be biased, premeditated, and authoritarian, violating the core objectives and...

  5. Inability on the part of Liquidator to take up the assignment - corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) - Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) - Penalty equal to...

  6. This case deals with the extinguishment of demands due to the non-filing of claims by the revenue during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the...

  7. The case pertains to the extinguishment of claims under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against Ruchi Soya Industries Limited, after the acceptance of the...

  8. Duties and functions carried out by IRP. - Disallowing certain CIRP expenses claimed by the Appellant/IRP - Withdrawal of CIRP under Section 12A of the IBC - the IRP...

  9. Classification - Even if the card kit is classifiable under the Central Excise Tariff Heading No.84.48, these three items viz. Traverse assembly , Drive king assembly...

  10. Withdrawal of CIRP - Whether the Resolution Professional can be permitted to withdraw the CIRP against the Corporate Debtor by invoking inherent powers under Rule 11 of...

  11. Replacement of IRP - the appointment of the Appellant as IRP was never confirmed by the CoC nor any material has been brought on record to indicate that the appointment...

  12. The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order dismissing the application for revival of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The...

  13. Scope of the Report of IRP - IRP was appointed on application under Section 94(1) - After appointing an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) and receiving a report...

  14. Filing of forms in the Registry (MCA-21) by the Insolvency Professional (Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) or Resolution Professional (RP) or Liquidator) appointed...

  15. Filing of forms in the Registry (MCA-21) by the Insolvency Professional (Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) or Resolution Professional (RP) or Liquidator) appointed...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates