Addition u/s 68 - whether Tribunal is right in law in accepting ...

Tribunal Supports Assessee on Section 68 Additions; High Court Finds No Substantial Legal Question Arises.

October 8, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Addition u/s 68 - whether Tribunal is right in law in accepting the contentions of the Assessee without giving an opportunity to the AO by way of a remand - the explanations in the context of Section 68 of the Income Tax Act have to be considered in the light of human probabilities and the explanations cannot be unreasonably rejected. - no substantial question of law arises. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Addition u/s 68 - whether Tribunal is right in law in accepting ...

Tribunal Supports Assessee on Section 68 Additions; High Court Finds No Substantial Legal Question Arises.

October 8, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the assessing officer against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, holding that no substantial question of law...

The Tribunal set aside the disallowance of short-term loss claimed by the assessee in the Profit and Loss Account, holding that the shares were acquired under a normal...

The case pertains to additions made by the Assessing Officer on account of bogus share application money and commission for bogus accommodation entries. The ITAT deleted...

Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share application money - genuineness and creditworthiness of the share capital subscription challenged - ITAT deleted addition - The Delhi...

Addition u/s 68 - substantial question of law - The Supreme court has held that, the jurisdiction of the High Court to interfere with the orders passed by the Courts...

Jurisdiction of civil court u/s 34 of SARFAESI Act was in question. Suit for declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction was rejected by lower courts under Order...

Revision u/s 263 challenged for lack of proper inquiry by Assessing Officer regarding cash deposits during demonetization, scrap sales, and non-submission of audit...

Bogus LTCG - exemption u/s 10(38) denied - The AO contended that the LTCG was undisclosed income arising from alleged manipulation in penny stocks. However, the assessee...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) adjudicated on various additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) as unexplained/bogus credits or trading liabilities. The...

The High Court held that the order u/s 263 made no reference to the issue of depreciation, and the Tribunal had correctly answered the question by stating that the...

The HC held that the Tribunal's decision deleting the addition u/s 68 was justified as the assessee had discharged its burden of substantiating the identity,...

Addition u/s 68 - unsecured loans Addition u/s 2(22)(e) - Deemed dividend - The Tribunal found merit in the Assessee's submissions, noting that all relevant documents...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the validity of penalty proceedings u/s 270A due to the failure to specify relevant clauses. It was held that the penalty proceedings...

Direction in original appellate proceeding - Not challenged - it cannot now question the findings of the lower appellate authority based on earlier direction - No...

Allowabiltry of depreciation - not claimed deprecation in either its original return or in its revised return - Tribunal allowed the depreciation - no substantial...

Quick Updates: