Scope of the adjudication proceeding where the case has been ...

Tribunal's Clear Orders Upheld: Unlawful Duplication of Demand Overturned After Remand; Appeal Proper Route for Disagreement.

March 4, 2021

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Scope of the adjudication proceeding where the case has been remanded back by the tribunal - The fact of duplication of demand has been specifically examined in both the tribunal’s order and the finding of both the orders are very clear and precise leaving no scope for interpretation. - In case the commissioner was aggrieved by the observation of the second tribunal order dated 24.01.2019 the right course of action was to take the matter to the higher forum and not to ignore the same. - The impugned order passed directly in violation of two tribunal’s orders is bad in law and is therefore set aside. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Scope of the adjudication proceeding where the case has been ...

Tribunal's Clear Orders Upheld: Unlawful Duplication of Demand Overturned After Remand; Appeal Proper Route for Disagreement.

March 4, 2021

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying...

Validity Of Order - Tax demand based on Audit observations - variation between the GSTR 3B return and Form 26AS - The High Court observed that there could be duplication...

Non-speaking order - It is clear that the order of Tribunal is certainly a non-speaking order and the Tribunal failed to consider the grounds raised by the appellant....

The assessee, a company engaged in development/construction and sale of flats and plots, had classified its properties into four categories: flats open for sale, let-out...

Validity of SCN - SCN suffers from incurable deficiency - Demand raised solely on the basis of Income Tax data shared by the Income Tax authorities - CESTAT found that...

Recovery of demand - initiation of Garnishee proceedings - The assessment order and the demand does not remain merely a piece of paper, unless an assessee gets relief by...

Refund of appropriated amount - Amount was recovered against CENVAT credit, but finally the demand was set aside - when unlawful demand has been set aside, the...

Doctrine of merger applied to impugned order of Appellate Tribunal imposing penalty on appellant. Held that since Supreme Court's judgment on appeal against Tribunal's...

The assessing officer (AO) is empowered u/s 275(1A) to revise the penalty order by giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee within six months from the...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed issues regarding the method of valuation of electrical motors, whether to apply Rule 8 or Rule 4 of the Central Excise (Valuation)...

Anti-Dumping Duty - Undervaluation of imported Flax yarn from sister companies / concerns - re-determined assessable value - The tribunal upheld the appellants'...

Finalisation of assessment and creation of extra demand - extension of the period of limitation - In the present case, since the assessment year is 2008-09, the period...

Validity of Compounding Order - The Tribunal in so many words has observed that there was no clear proposal in the show-cause notice with regard to imposition of the...

Was the Hon'ble Tribunal correct in holding in the appeal preferred by the appellant that the duty demanded is upheld when actually the duty was not demanded even in the...

Duplication of demand by issuing two show cause notices (SCN) for the same period - Sabka Vishwas Legacy Disputes Resolution Scheme, 2019 (SVLDRS) - The Dispute...

Quick Updates: