Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - addition as concealed income ...

Court Orders New Review of Alleged Concealed Income u/ss 147 & 69 Due to Unaddressed Evidence.

May 8, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - addition as concealed income u/s. 69 - The fact that the assessee has consistently alleged connivance of the bank authorities coupled with the fact that the currency details and lack of PAN details of the depositor evident on record remain unrebutted on record by the tax authorities cannot be allowed to remain ignored. In the facts as they stand unless these assertions are rebutted by cogent evidence, the assessee appears to have a claim which cannot be easily discarded - Matter remitted back for fresh adjudication - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - addition as concealed income ...

Court Orders New Review of Alleged Concealed Income u/ss 147 & 69 Due to Unaddressed Evidence.

May 8, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Validity of order passed u/ss 154/147/143(3) - Disallowance of prior period expenses - Relevant previous year being first year of assessee's business, no prior period...

In the matter under review, the High Court dismissed the review petitions filed by the parties. The Court held that no grounds were established for seeking a review of...

The review petition challenges the order imposing interest liability over the withheld amount and cost on the Managing Director. The court held that reviewing an order...

The assessment reopening u/s 147 read with Section 148 was found to be unsustainable due to the lack of independent application of mind by the Commissioner of Income Tax...

Reassessment proceeding under Section 147 was made to form change of opinion and therefore, it would clearly amount to reviewing the original order of assessment u/s 147...

The High Court rejected the application for grant of anticipatory bail filed by the applicants u/s 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The Court held that the...

Tribunal held that an order passed following binding precedents cannot be recalled or reviewed based on a subsequent contrary judgment of a higher court. Once an order...

Validity of order passed u/s 147 - not providing any opportunity of hearing - Though this Court is very reluctant to interfere with any order u/s 143(3) or u/s 147 since...

The case involves a review petition filed in the Madhya Pradesh High Court seeking to recall an order that dismissed an appeal due to the absence of substantial...

Seizure of tobacco and loss of the same due to file - Liability of central excise department - Whether the Trial Court has committed error of facts and law in passing...

A review application is maintainable on (i) discovery of new and important evidence which could not be produced earlier despite due diligence, (ii) mistake or error...

The High Court considered the maintainability of a review petition based on a subsequent judgment and the condonation of a 619-day delay in filing the civil review...

The assessee's appeal against the Commissioner's revision order u/s 263 was dismissed. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer (AO), after reopening the assessment...

Penalty u/s 271 (1) (c) - Income disclosed only after the search and seizure operation - The High Court emphasized that Explanation 5A of Section 271(1)(c) deems...

Validity of review order - Period of limitation - It cannot be understood what prevented the Department from submitting before the Commissioner (Appeals) that the...

Quick Updates: