Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus purchases @ 25% on total purchase ...

Case Laws Income Tax

March 1, 2022

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus purchases @ 25% on total purchase - After analyzing the order of the A.O. as well as the ld. CIT(A), we also found that both the lower authorities had made respective additions on the basis of estimation and it is settled law that no penalty can be levied on disallowance made on the ground of unverifiable purchases - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus purchases @ 25% on total purchase ...

Case Laws Income Tax

March 1, 2022

You may also like:

The ITAT Mumbai addressed two key issues in the case. Firstly, regarding the penalty u/s 271(1)(c), the tribunal held that the absence of a tick mark on the notice did...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases by applying the profit rate - Once there is no reason to disbelieve the sales made by the assessee and...

The ITAT Mumbai ruled on penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for estimation of income on bogus purchases. The tribunal held that penalty cannot be levied on additions made on an...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Estimation of income on bogus purchases - Once the quantitative details of purchases and the corresponding quantitative sales have not been...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation of income - bogus purchases - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied where the addition is made on estimate basis - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Bogus purchases - no clinching material had been brought on record by the revenue which could disprove the authenticity of the purchases claimed...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Bogus purchases - we are of a strong conviction that in the absence of documentary evidence supporting the genuineness of the purchases claimed...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus purchases - No clinching material had been brought on record by the revenue which could disprove the authenticity of the purchases claimed...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Addition of bogus purchases - Tribunal in quantum proceedings reduced to 12.5% of such purchases - since income has been estimated by applying a...

Monetary limit for filing of appeal by revenue in case of penalty - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on bogus purchases - Quantum proceedings and penalty proceedings are...

Penalty u/s 271(c) was imposed on additions of 25% of non-verifiable purchases debited to the trading account. The addition was made on estimation of total turnover...

In the case of 2024 (5) TMI 1132 before the ITAT Mumbai, the issue pertained to penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c) concerning the estimation of income on bogus purchases....

Levy of penalty u/s 271(l)(c) - bogus purchase made from hawala dealers - mere disallowance of purchases on adhoc basis does not tantamount to willful furnishing...

Bogus purchases - oil cakes shown as purchases by the assessee from 33 parties were not genuine transactions -Tribunal was justified in disallowing 25% of the purchase price - HC

Additions towards Bogus purchases - Estimation of profit - Purchases are to be removed, the corresponding sale is also required to be removed from the profit and loss...

Quick Updates: