Refund of Customs Duty paid - principles of unjust enrichment - ...

Customs Duty Refund Denied: Appellant Failed to Prove No Duty Burden Passed to Others, Violating Unjust Enrichment Principles.

April 27, 2022

Case Laws Customs AT

Refund of Customs Duty paid - principles of unjust enrichment - expenditure written off while creating the entry as Receivable in the Balance Sheet - As soon as a particular amount is charged to expenditure, it is deemed to have been recovered in the shape of the price of the goods. In the instant case, by creating an entry for receivables and thereafter, creating an entry for provision in the ledgers, the appellant has nullified these entries. Consequently, the entire amount of duty paid is passed on as an expenditure to the profit and loss account. Thus the appellant has failed to discharge the burden of unjust enrichment. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund of Customs Duty paid - principles of unjust enrichment - ...

Customs Duty Refund Denied: Appellant Failed to Prove No Duty Burden Passed to Others, Violating Unjust Enrichment Principles.

April 27, 2022

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

CESTAT allowed refund of customs duty paid twice through customs broker for same import consignment. Appellant demonstrated through Bill of Entry, payment challans, and...

Refund of export duty paid in excess - conclusive evidence to discharge the burden of unjust enrichment - The CESTAT observed that the contract between the buyer and...

Refund of Customs duty - unjust enrichment - Chennai Port Trust (the buyer) had indeed borne the duty burden, as evidenced by financial records and a letter from the...

Refund - Unjust enrichment - burden of duty is transferred to the buyer of the goods or not - Merely CA Certificate per se cannot be the sole ground for proving that...

Refund of wrongly paid Central Excise Duty on Retail Sale Price (Maximum Retail Price-MRP) - unjust enrichment - The authorities concluded that the appellant had passed...

Refund of Service Tax - unjust enrichment - seeking refund to customers - there is no provision, whatsoever, in section 11B by which one person who has paid the service...

Refund claim of excess duty denied due to unjust enrichment - goods sold based on LME price index. Revenue contended appellant booked excess duty as revenue expenditure...

Confiscation - Smuggling of Betel Nuts - discharge of burden to prove u/s 123 of Customs Act - The betel nut is not notified under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962...

Power to issue SCN - Recovery of erroneous refund with interest - It is more than apparent that section 11A of the Excise Act cannot be resorted to by the Department for...

Refund of duty - Principles of unjust enrichment - appellant has not included customs duty element (CVD and SAD) on the goods imported in the cost of their manufacture...

Refund of SAD - denial of refund on the ground that the test of unjust enrichment not passed on - non-collection of excess duty paid by the appellant - The certificate...

Refund of Excess Customs Duty paid - principles of unjust enrichment - Following proceedings before the Settlement Commission, it was determined that the appellant had...

CESTAT held that the appellant's refund claims following provisional assessment finalization were barred by unjust enrichment doctrine. While the appellant demonstrated...

HC held that Extra Duty Deposit (EDD) does not constitute customs duty under Section 27 of Customs Act, 1962, but rather functions as a security deposit as clarified in...

CESTAT dismissed an appeal concerning refund claims for excess Countervailing Duty (CVD) on mobile phone imports. The tribunal upheld rejection on three grounds:...

Quick Updates: