Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2023 Year 2023 This

Addition u/s 68 - the assessee has furnished all the evidences ...


Additions u/s 68 deleted as assessee proves investor identity, creditworthiness, and transaction genuineness. No need to produce directors.

January 18, 2023

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Addition u/s 68 - the assessee has furnished all the evidences proving identity and creditworthiness of the investors and genuineness of the transactions - AO simply harped on the non production of directors of the assessee and share subscribing companies to make the addition which is not correct - Additions deleted - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. In a case concerning unexplained credit u/s 68, the assessee proved the identity and genuineness of share applicants, although their creditworthiness was questioned. The...

  2. The assessee successfully discharged the onus u/s 68 regarding share capital introduced by the company director, a major shareholder, proving identity, creditworthiness,...

  3. Unexplained share capital and premium received by assessee company was its own unaccounted money flowing back in form of premium on share allotment. Assessee filed...

  4. The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal. The assessee furnished all evidence proving identity, creditworthiness of investors, and genuineness of transactions regarding...

  5. Addition u/s 68 - bogus share capital & share premium - The assessee failed to prove that the transactions of share application money is genuine and the creditworthiness...

  6. Addition under section 68 being share capital received and addition under section 69C on account of commission - some of Directors did not appear in the case of assessee...

  7. Non-proving identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of share premium received cannot be treated as unexplained income if sufficient documentary evidence is provided....

  8. Addition u/s. 68 - satisfaction regarding the identity and creditworthiness of the 13 investors who have invested in the share capital of the assessee company and the...

  9. The assessee company received share capital and share application money from 13 share applicants. The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition u/s 68, alleging that the...

  10. Addition u/s. 68 being unsecured loans - onus to prove - The ITAT held that, primary onus can be discharged by establishing/furnishing the proof of the identity of the...

  11. Addition u/s 68 - unexplained cash credits - Onus to prove - CIT(A) deleted addition - The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to discharge its onus of proving the...

  12. Addition u/s 68 - onus to prove the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the share applicants - Both the nature & source of the share application received was...

  13. Addition u/s 68 - share application money received as unaccounted cash credit - identity and creditworthiness of the share subscribers and genuineness of the transaction...

  14. Assessee challenged addition on account of unproved sundry creditors u/s 41(1), contending evidence of liability cessation was provided. AO held assessee failed to prove...

  15. Addition u/s 68 - Unexplained cash credit - it could safely be concluded that the assessee was successful in proving the identity of the investors, creditworthiness of...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates