Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - furnishing of inaccurate particulars of ...

High Court Upholds ITAT Decision: No Penalty for Bona Fide Error u/s 271(1)(c) on Excess Depreciation Claim.

July 25, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income - the addition made in the impugned case on account of excess depreciation claimed having been surrendered by the assessee itself without any prior detection of the Revenue and the excess claim having been demonstrated to have been made for the bonafide reasons - ITAT has rightly deleted the penalty - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - furnishing of inaccurate particulars of ...

High Court Upholds ITAT Decision: No Penalty for Bona Fide Error u/s 271(1)(c) on Excess Depreciation Claim.

July 25, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

No penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed on the assessee for disallowance of depreciation. The ITAT held that the assessee did not deliberately claim depreciation with an...

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of depreciation - he explanation given by the assessee for the claim of depreciation is neither bona fide nor...

Imposition of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The explanation given by the assessee for the depreciation claim, is neither bona-fide, nor substantiated - penalty confirmed - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed for excess deduction claimed u/s 10B. The assessee furnished all relevant facts for computing total income, and provided detailed...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – In the garb of the bona fide claim an assessee cannot escape levy of penalty - Onus was not on the AO to prove the negative - AT

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - bona fide or mala fide with an intention to evade taxes - not exigible to levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act where the...

Explanation versus bona finde explanation versus proper disclosure - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The Revenue argued that the assessee's actions constituted furnishing inaccurate particulars of income or concealing income. However, the High...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The Revenue may or may not agree with this understanding of law of the assessee but the fact that there can be a bona fide view to that effect...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving the disallowance of electricity expenses leading to a penalty u/s 271(1)(c). The Tribunal noted the essential role of...

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) – assessee in bona fide belief that Dharmada collections were not part of its income but were diverted by an overriding title towards...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - disallowance of expenses - Proof of bonafied error - there was wrong claim in the return of income filed by the assessee which cannot partake...

The ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not imposable on the assessee. The assessee had voluntarily paid tax on income from sale of shares three years prior to...

Quick Updates: