Penalty u/s 271D - period of limitation - CIT(A) took the date ...

Case Laws Income Tax

January 2, 2024

Penalty u/s 271D - period of limitation - CIT(A) took the date on which the one year period from the end of the financial year in which the notice was issued as 31/03/2022. - We are unable to understand where from this date has come. Expiry of one year is not relatable to this date either from the date of the assessment order for the assessment year 2017-18 or from the date of issuance of notice u/s 271D of the Act, initiating the proceedings. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271D - period of limitation - CIT(A) took the date ...

Case Laws Income Tax

January 2, 2024

You may also like:

Validity of order u/s.201 & u/s.201(1A) - tds liability - period of limitation - As per this time limit to pass order u/s.201(1) & 201(1A) of the Act is two years from...

TDS liability - period of limitation - proceedings u/s 201 can be initiated by the TDS office within the period of 2 years from the end of the financial year in which...

Validity of order passed u/s. 201(1)/201(1A) - period of limitation - expiry of two years from the end of the financial year in which TDS statement was filed - As...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271D, 271E and 271AAA - period of limitation - the period of six months from the end of the month in which action for imposition of penalty was...

Notice issued for reopening assessment u/s 147 was beyond the limitation period stipulated in Section 149(1). The High Court, following Ojjus Medicare Pvt. Limited,...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - period of limitation - The High Court observed that, the three-year time period of A.Y 2016-17 had ended on 31.03.2020. Accordingly,...

Re-assessment - Time limitation for notices issued - period of limitation enhanced from 5 years to 6 years - Prospective or retrospective amendment - 5 year period...

The key points are regarding the penalty imposed u/s 271D read with Section 269SS, and the issue of whether the penalty orders were time-barred. The Assessing Officer...

The ITAT Delhi held that the levy of penalty u/s 271D without valid satisfaction for alleged violation u/s 269SS is not justified. The AO must record satisfaction in the...

Proceedings initiated u/s.201(1) & 201(1A) - Period of limitation - retrospective effect of amendments - period extended from 2 years to 6 years - The provisions of...

Delay of 10 years for adjudicating the case - Liability of cess on bringing goods within the limits of Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation - since the Commissioner failed...

Period of limitation for levy of penalty - Penalty proceedings u/s 271D - penalty order, was passed beyond the time period prescribed by Section 275(1)(c) - the same...

Non deduction of TDS - Period of limitation u/s 201(3) - proceedings under section 201/201(1A) of the Act, can be initiated only within three years from the end of the...

Penalty u/s 271D - violation of provisions u/s 269SS - cash receipt claimed as advance against sales - recording of the satisfaction by the AO is sine qua non for...

Section 153C provisions are inapplicable as notice was issued to 'other person' under this section. Computation of six-year block period preceding assessment year...

Quick Updates: