Levy of penalty - Part B of E-Way Bills was not filled up - The ...

Court Annuls Illegal Detention Order Over E-Way Bill Error, Finds No Intent to Evade Tax.

February 9, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

Levy of penalty - Part B of E-Way Bills was not filled up - The High Court noted that, apart from the factual aspect that the Part B of E-Way Bills was not filled up, there is no material on record to show that the petitioner had any mens rea to evade tax. It is to be noted that the invoice, that was being carried, matched with the goods in the truck and the goods were not in variance with the invoice. - The HC held that, the reason of presumption of evasion of tax is without any basis in law, and accordingly, the order of detention and subsequent appellate order are illegal and required to be set aside.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty - Part B of E-Way Bills was not filled up - The ...

Court Annuls Illegal Detention Order Over E-Way Bill Error, Finds No Intent to Evade Tax.

February 9, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Levy of penalty for violation of section 129 and Rule 138 - Failure to update the E-way bill on change of vehicle after breakdown - The imposition of penalties for mere...

Penalty order - Part-B of the e-way bill was not filled up - intent to evade tax - The High court, referencing a previous judgment, ruled that such technical errors, in...

Penalty order - wrongful mention of place of supply in E-Way bills - intent to evade tax or not - The High Court noted that the incorrect address mentioned in the E-Way...

Levy of penalty - goods were unloaded at a place that was not registered in the registration certificate - unloading goods at a location not specified in the e-way bill...

Levy of penalty - at the time of detention was that one of the E-Way Bills had expired - The High court held that mens rea to evade tax is essential for imposing...

Detention of goods on onward journey - detention on ground goods dispatched to different place than mentioned in documents - levy of penalty u/s 129 of UPGST Act -...

The case involved a challenge to a penalty imposed u/s 129 of the Goods and Service Tax Acts. The court held that without proof of intent to evade tax, such penalties...

Imposition of tax and penalty u/s 129(3) - e-way bill had expired nine hours and thirty minutes prior to interception - The High court referred to previous cases where...

Levy of Penalty u/s 129(3) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 - Errors in e-way bills - The Court emphasized that minor typographical errors in e-way bills,...

Levy of penalty - non filling up of Part 'B' of the e-Way Bill - existence of mens rea or not The High Court referenced a specific case and highlighted that the issue of...

E-Way Bill was not properly filled, but upon inspection, no discrepancy was found between the physically available goods and the goods disclosed in the E-Way Bill. The...

Intent to evade tax or not - Challenged the physical inspection and verification report - Penalty - detention on the ground that address of the consigner not found...

The key points are: Appropriation of Rs. 11,00,000 deposited under protest during investigation cannot be considered as acceptance of liability. The extended period of...

Levy of penalty u/s 129(3) - non filling up of Part 'B' of the e-Way Bill - Referencing the judgment in M/s Citykart Retail Pvt. Ltd.'s case, the Court observed that the...

Levy of tax / penalty - error with regard to the address of the consignee in the E-Way Bill - The High court observes that in numerous judgments, it has been established...

Quick Updates: