The High Court quashed the seizure order and allowed the ...

High Court quashed seizure order as E-way bill produced before order; no contravention occurred. Authorities didn't verify transaction.

Case Laws GST

August 14, 2024

The High Court quashed the seizure order and allowed the petition, holding that once the E-way bill was produced before the seizure order could be passed, it could not be said that any contravention of the Act's provisions had occurred. The court observed that although the goods were initially detained due to the absence of an E-way bill, the petitioner subsequently produced the E-way bill before the seizure order was issued. The authorities had the power to survey the petitioner's business premises to verify the transaction's correctness but chose not to exercise it. The court distinguished the case from the precedent cited, where goods were seized due to a complete lack of accompanying documents.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court quashed the seizure order and allowed the ...

High Court quashed seizure order as E-way bill produced before order; no contravention occurred. Authorities didn't verify transaction.

Case Laws GST

August 14, 2024

You may also like:

100% EOU - diversion of imported/indigenous goods procured duty free - The learned adjudicating authority has not examined the fact whether the respondent have achieved...

Maintenance of Proper Accounts and furnishing thereof - the requirement of duly verified and certified by the jurisdictional Excise Authority modified - now this power...

Exemption from service tax - providing transportation of agricultural produce - De-novo order passed by the adjudicating authority during the pendency of the appeal -...

Validity of remanding the matter to the Assessing Authority - the first appellate authority has adjudicated the controversy on merits and therefore, the tribunal, which...

The High Court held that the petitioners have the option to file writ petitions challenging the orders of the Revisionary Authority either before the High Court within...

Exemption from GST - pure services or supply of goods to the Notified Area Authority, Vapi - Notified Area Authority, Vapi is a “local authority” or “governmental...

The subordinate authority is not empowered to supersede the orders passed by the appellate authority and an administrative discipline requires that the subordinate...

Validity of order of passed by the Revisional authority - The respondent authorities acting as quasi judiciary authority by invoking the power under statute are expected...

Control of income-tax authorities - U/s 118 of IT ACT 1961 - Specifies the income-tax authority or authorities as subordinate to such other income-tax authority or...

Penalty u/s 117 of the Customs Act, 1962 was levied against appellants, Customs House Agents (CHAs), for not exercising due diligence. The allegation was that appellants...

Revocation of CHA License - appellant failed to verify the address at which the two clients operated and that requirement of ‘know your customer (KYC)’ was entirely...

The court found that the factual position was not in dispute. The authority made assessments for the financial years 2017-18 and 2018-19 based on an intelligence report....

Imported flow meters, pressure transmitters, level transmitters, parts and accessories were classified under tariff headings 9032 8990 and 9032 9000 or 9026 of Customs...

Adjudicating Authority under FEMA - The High Court clarified that the Adjudicating Authority is not a persona designata, but a designation empowered by the Act. The...

CESTAT NEW DELHI ruled on the revocation of a Customs Broker License and forfeiture of security deposit. The case involved risky exporters engaged in frauds, with...

Quick Updates: