Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2025 Year 2025 This

The ITAT held that a statement/document received from a third ...


Additions based solely on third-party statements inadmissible without cross-examination opportunity.

January 6, 2025

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

The ITAT held that a statement/document received from a third party cannot be relied upon for making an addition u/s 69A, without giving the assessee an opportunity to contradict the same and cross-examine the person who gave the statement/document. The suo-moto disclosure made by the assessee before the Settlement Commission, without corroborative material/evidence, cannot be the basis for making an addition. In the present case, except for a letter filed before the DCIT/Settlement Commission, there was no other corroborative material/evidence for sustaining the addition. Moreover, no opportunity was given to the assessee to cross-examine the person who made the disclosure/issued the letter relied upon for the addition. Consequently, the addition was held unsustainable and deleted in favor of the assessee.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Addition made u/s 69C of the Income Tax Act for alleged cash payments based on a WhatsApp message and statement of a third party. The key points are: The WhatsApp...

  2. Disallowance based on third party information about unexplained purchases was challenged. ITAT held that the additions were unsustainable as the disallowance was solely...

  3. The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

  4. Unsubstantiated and uncorroborated seized material alone cannot be considered conclusive evidence for additions u/s 69B. The words "may be presumed" in Section 132(4)...

  5. Addition u/s 68 cannot be made solely based on sworn statement recorded u/s 132(4) without corroborative materials. Onus lies on the Department to collect cogent...

  6. The case involved the legality of assessment u/s 153A vs. 153C based on materials found during a search of a third party. It was held that assessment u/s 153A cannot be...

  7. Addition u/s 68 - receipt of share application money - reliance on statement of third parties - The statements of third parties i.e. two angadias relied upon by the ld....

  8. Validity of assessment order - whether the AO can make additions solely relying upon the third party statement and without any further corroborative evidence - Held No - HC

  9. Unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - AO made addition of loan based on statement of a person who retract subsequently - it is the revenue which had placed reliance on the...

  10. The case pertains to the allegation of clandestine manufacture and clearance of structural items/rolled products by the appellant. The revenue's case rested solely on...

  11. Legality of the addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) regarding the gain on sale of agricultural land, based on the alleged understatement of consideration paid....

  12. Unexplained investment - Unaccounted cash for purchase - addition based on the statement / admission of the third party - Mere admission of the third party cannot be a...

  13. Digital images and Excel files found on partner's phone cannot be relied upon for making additions u/s 69C for unexplained expenditure. Loose papers and documents not...

  14. Validity of reassessment order u/s 147 - Denial of Cross-Examination Opportunity - Reliance of statement of third party - The High Court noted that the petitioner did...

  15. Disallowance based on third party information gathered by Investigation Wing of the Department - AO denied opportunity of cross examination - High Court affirmed the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates