ITAT allowed appeal against addition made under Section 68 for ...

Share Capital Addition Under Section 68 Deleted After Subscribers Prove Creditworthiness Through Financial Statements

February 3, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

ITAT allowed appeal against addition made under Section 68 for alleged bogus share capital. Three share subscribers - Aakansha Advisory Services Pvt Ltd, Sunirmiti Mercantile Pvt Ltd and Arihant Enterprises Ltd - demonstrated adequate creditworthiness through their balance sheets and financial statements for FY 2016-17. The Tribunal held that assessee successfully discharged onus by establishing identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of transactions. CIT(A)'s dismissal solely on grounds of FY 2015-16 statements being furnished instead of FY 2016-17 was incorrect. Non-compliance with notices under Section 133(6) alone cannot justify addition when substantive evidence of creditworthiness exists. Addition deleted.

View Source

← Previous Next →

ITAT allowed appeal against addition made under Section 68 for ...

Share Capital Addition Under Section 68 Deleted After Subscribers Prove Creditworthiness Through Financial Statements

February 3, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Unexplained share capital and premium received by assessee company was its own unaccounted money flowing back in form of premium on share allotment. Assessee filed...

Addition u/s 68 - share application money received as unaccounted cash credit - identity and creditworthiness of the share subscribers and genuineness of the transaction...

Non-proving identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of share premium received cannot be treated as unexplained income if sufficient documentary evidence is provided....

Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share capital receipts - Onus to prove -Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share capital receipts - Onus to prove - SC dismissed the SLP against...

In a case concerning unexplained credit u/s 68, the assessee proved the identity and genuineness of share applicants, although their creditworthiness was questioned. The...

Addition u/s 68 - share capital and share premium - no enquiries were conducted by the ld AO u/s 133(6) and/or 131 from the share subscribers - the assessee by producing...

The assessee company received share capital and share application money from 13 share applicants. The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition u/s 68, alleging that the...

Addition u/s 68 - Bogus share capital and share premium received. The assessee failed to prove the identity and creditworthiness of the subscriber companies and the...

Unexplained share capital/share premium - proof of genuine investors - the assessee has been able to prove identity of the share applicants, their creditworthiness and...

Addition u/s 68 - bogus share capital & share premium - The assessee failed to prove that the transactions of share application money is genuine and the creditworthiness...

Unexplained share capital and share premium - Not only the assessee has proved the identity and creditworthiness of the investors and genuineness of the transactions by...

Revision u/s 263 - addition made u/s. 68 - Assessee had discharged the onus upon it about the identity creditworthiness and genuineness of the share capital and premium...

The assessee successfully discharged the onus u/s 68 regarding share capital introduced by the company director, a major shareholder, proving identity, creditworthiness,...

Addition u/s 68 - onus to prove the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the share applicants - Both the nature & source of the share application received was...

Even if it be assumed that the subscribers to the share capital were not genuine, such share capital could not be regarded as undisclosed income of the company

Quick Updates: