HC affirmed that blocking under Rule 86A of Orissa GST Rules ...

Tax Authorities Must Initiate Recovery Within One Year of ITC Block Under Rule 86A to Prevent Automatic Unblocking

February 11, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

HC affirmed that blocking under Rule 86A of Orissa GST Rules serves as revenue security by preventing utilization of future ITC through negative balance insertion in electronic credit ledger. The court emphasized the necessity for tax authorities to initiate recovery proceedings within the one-year blocking period, as automatic unblocking would otherwise allow dealers to access and debit ITC from their electronic ledger. The temporary restriction mechanism ensures tax authorities can secure potential recoveries while maintaining procedural safeguards. The ruling clarifies that such preventive measures are valid when aligned with proper recovery actions within the prescribed timeframe.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC affirmed that blocking under Rule 86A of Orissa GST Rules ...

Tax Authorities Must Initiate Recovery Within One Year of ITC Block Under Rule 86A to Prevent Automatic Unblocking

February 11, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

The High Court addressed the issue of parallel proceedings initiated by both State and Central GST Authorities against the petitioner for the same assessment years. For...

Continuation of Criminal Proceedings - matter is pending for adjudication - The proceedings initiated against these petitioners are kept in abeyance till the disposal of...

The court held that Section 6(2)(b) of the Act treats the empowered officers under the SGST/UGST Act at the central level to be at par and does not prescribe for...

Initiation of CIRP - period of limitation - whether the issuance of Recovery Certificate would not trigger the right to sue. - A liability in respect of a claim arising...

This is a summary of a court judgment regarding the interpretation of Rule 86A of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, which deals with the blocking of input...

Jurisdiction - proper officer to issue summons and conduct inquiry - Investigation / Enquiry proceedings initiation by different authorities of state and central GST -...

The High Court dismissed the petition seeking refund of Input Tax Credit (ITC) accrued under the Value Added Tax (VAT) regime upon transition to the Goods and Services...

Exercise of Revisional Jurisdiction after seven years - the bar of limitation, to initiate revisional jurisdiction under Section 46 (1) of the VAT Act, 2005 within five...

The Instruction issued by the Government of India (CBIC) provides guidelines for initiating recovery proceedings u/s 79 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017...

Refund of service tax paid - Period of limitation - As the refund claim has been filed within one year from the date of the adjudication order wherein it has been held...

The High Court held that once a proper officer initiates proceedings on a subject matter under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) or the Haryana...

The High Court directed the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Guwahati, to ensure disposal of the petitioner's appeals filed for assessment years 2020-21 and 2018-19...

The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the notice in Form ASMT-10 issued by the state authorities for blocking the electronic credit/cash ledger. The court...

The provisions of the IBC 2016 would prevail over the Income Tax Act 1961. Income Tax authorities have limited jurisdiction to assess/determine the quantum of Income Tax...

This case involves a challenge to a garnish order issued by tax authorities for recovering income tax and penalties. The High Court, considering the Supreme Court's...

Quick Updates: