The HC ruled that seizure of the petitioner's gold chain by ...

Customs' Seizure of Wedding Guest's Gold Chain Overturned Under Baggage Rules 2016 for Non-Resident Travelers

March 17, 2025

Case Laws Customs HC

The HC ruled that seizure of the petitioner's gold chain by Customs authorities was unjustified. The petitioner, a UAE resident traveling to India for a wedding, was entitled to benefits under the Baggage Rules, 2016 as an eligible non-resident passenger. Photographic evidence confirmed the chain was personal jewelry, which according to established precedent is not subject to confiscation. The court found procedural violations as no show cause notice was issued nor personal hearing afforded, violating principles of natural justice. The adjudication order was quashed, with directions that no penalty, redemption fine, or warehousing charges be collected from the petitioner, and any amounts already paid be refunded.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The HC ruled that seizure of the petitioner's gold chain by ...

Customs' Seizure of Wedding Guest's Gold Chain Overturned Under Baggage Rules 2016 for Non-Resident Travelers

March 17, 2025

Case Laws Customs HC

You may also like:

HC invalidated confiscation orders regarding seized gold ornaments worn by petitioners at arrival. Court found multiple procedural violations: no show cause notice...

Import of Gold - bonafide baggage or not - the petitioner has violated the provisions of the Customs and Baggage Rules, 2016. The petitioner was duty bound to declare...

HC ruled in favor of petitioner, ordering release of seized gold jewelry within 7 days. The court determined that Baggage Rules 2016 provision regarding items "carried...

HC ruled in favor of a Russian tourist regarding customs detention of a gold chain. The court established three key principles: (1) bona fide personal jewelry falls...

HC ruled that gold bangles worn by a passenger returning to India do not constitute "baggage" under the Customs Act 1962 and Baggage Rules 2016. The court determined...

The High Court held that personal jewellery which is not newly acquired during an overseas trip, but rather has been a used personal effect carried by the passenger,...

The HC quashed the confiscation order of a gold chain valued at Rs. 1,76,488/- from the petitioner, a UAE resident who was traveling to India for a wedding. The Court...

Direction to the respondent to release his gold chain in terms of Section 110(2) of the Customs Act, as amended upto date - Baggage Rule - Revenue has dealt with the...

Seeks to amend Baggage Rules, 2016 - Notification

Absolute Confiscation of the seized gold and foreign currency - Prohibited item or not - Baggage Rules - The appellant claimed that he was misdirected at the airport and...

The court held that the Original Authority and Revisional Authority misconstrued the scheme and objectives of the Baggage Rules. The petitioner, a foreign national,...

Appeal shall lie before the Tribunal under Section 129A or not - Baggage Rules, 2016 - Section 129A(1)(a) makes it clear that no appeal shall lie to the Tribunal in...

Jurisdiction/power of Tribunal to hear the appeal - Section 129 of Customs Act - Gold bars imported as Baggage - Baggage Rules, 2016 are applicable - Order of...

Smuggling - Gold bars - concealment in the baggage - the applicant crossed the green channel without declaring the impugned articles in his possession in the Customs...

The High Court held that the personal gold jewelry, consisting of a necklace and bracelet weighing 0.178 grams, worn by a tourist traveling from Azerbaijan to India,...

Quick Updates: