Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2009 (6) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2009 (6) TMI 883 - AT - Central Excise

Issues:
Waiver of pre-deposit of Cenvat credit amount irregularly availed by the appellants for rent-a-cab service for employees.

Analysis:
The judgment revolves around the application filed by M/s. Lakshmi Machine Works seeking waiver of pre-deposit of Rs. 4,05,336/-, including interest and penalty, related to irregularly availed Cenvat credit for rent-a-cab services for employee transport and business-related visits. The demand arose due to denial of input service credit by the appellants. The consultant for the appellants cited a Tribunal decision in Commissioner of Central Excise v. Cable Corporation Ltd., where it was established that services availed under the 'rent-a-cab' category for employee transportation contributed to greater efficiency and business promotion. Based on this precedent, the Tribunal found that the appellants had presented a prima facie case against the impugned demand and penalty. Consequently, the Tribunal ordered a complete waiver of the adjudged dues and stayed the recovery pending the appeal decision.

This judgment highlights the significance of legal precedents in tax matters, emphasizing the relevance of case law in establishing a prima facie case against demands and penalties. It underscores the importance of demonstrating how services availed are indirectly related to business activities and contribute to operational efficiency and business promotion. The Tribunal's decision to grant a waiver of the dues and stay recovery pending the appeal showcases the judicial discretion exercised in balancing the interests of the appellants with the tax authorities' claims. The case serves as a reminder of the nuanced considerations involved in tax credit disputes and the role of legal interpretations in shaping outcomes in such matters.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates