Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2013 (10) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2013 (10) TMI 561 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
Interpretation of Notification No.67/95-CE dated 16.3.95 regarding exemption for captively used goods in manufacturing final products cleared on duty payment. Applicability of the notification to aluminum slabs used in manufacturing aluminum sheets cleared without duty payment under Notification No.6/2006 against International Competitive Bidding.

Analysis:
The appellant, engaged in manufacturing aluminum sheets, also produces aluminum slabs for captive use in manufacturing sheets. The issue revolves around the interpretation of Notification No.67/95-CE, which exempts goods used captively in manufacturing final products cleared on duty payment. The Revenue contended that since some aluminum sheets were supplied without duty payment to Mega Power Projects under Notification No.6/2006, the appellant is not entitled to the benefit of captive consumption under Notification No.67/95-CE. This led to duty demands and penalties imposed on the appellant.

Upon examination, it was found that the benefit of Notification No.67/95-CE is available to manufacturers producing both dutiable and exempted final products, provided they comply with Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2001. Rule 6 mandates maintaining separate records for inputs or paying a percentage of exempted final product value. However, an exception exists for goods cleared without duty payment in specified cases, such as International Competitive Bidding under Notification No.6/2006. This exception exempts manufacturers from certain provisions of Rule 6, ensuring no reversal of credit is required, thus fulfilling the conditions of Notification No.67/95-CE.

Moreover, previous Tribunal decisions in similar cases supported the appellant's stance, emphasizing that goods cleared under International Competitive Bidding are covered under exceptions to Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, thereby upholding the applicability of Notification No.67/95-CE. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, dispensing with the pre-deposit of duty and penalties, and staying the recovery of the same. Both stay petitions were allowed based on the above analysis.

This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the intricate legal interpretation of notifications, rules, exceptions, and precedents that played a crucial role in determining the appellant's entitlement to the exemption under Notification No.67/95-CE for the aluminum slabs used in manufacturing aluminum sheets cleared without duty payment against International Competitive Bidding.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates