9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
- Interpretation of the provisions of the Income-tax Act of 1961 regarding the appealability of orders related to the registration of a firm. - Determination of whether the issue of registration of a firm can be raised in an appeal under section 246(c) of the Income-tax Act. Analysis: The judgment pertains to an application made under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act of 1961, seeking the court's opinion on the issue of whether the Appellate Tribunal was correct in holding that the registration of a firm cannot be raised in an appeal under section 246(c) of the Act. The case involves a firm that was reconstituted with three partners following the death of the managing partner and the relinquishment of two other partners. The Income-tax Officer rejected the firm's application for registration for the assessment year 1968-69, treating it as unregistered due to a procedural lapse in filing the necessary forms. The firm appealed the decision, challenging its status, and subsequently took the matter to the Tribunal, which is now referred to the High Court for opinion. The interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act is crucial in this case. Section 246 outlines the orders appealable to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, including those related to the denial of liability, assessment orders, and cancellation of firm registration. The court analyzed the provisions of clauses (c), (j), and (k) of section 246 to determine the scope of appealable orders concerning the status of a firm. It was noted that clauses (j) and (k) specifically address issues related to the registration and cancellation of firm registration, indicating a separate treatment for these matters. The court's analysis focused on the statutory framework and the principle of interpretation that special provisions override general provisions. It was concluded that the term "status" in clause (c) of section 246 does not encompass disputes regarding the registration of a firm, as specific provisions exist in clauses (j) and (k) to address such issues. Therefore, the Tribunal's decision to exclude the registration issue from the appeal under section 246(c) was deemed appropriate based on a harmonious construction of the statutory provisions. In light of the above analysis, the High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, ruling against the assessee. The judgment clarified that the issue of firm registration cannot be raised by challenging the status in an appeal under section 246(c) of the Income-tax Act of 1961. The court made no order as to costs, and both judges, R.N. Misra and N.K. Das, concurred with the decision.
|
