Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases SEBI SEBI + SCH SEBI - 2020 (12) TMI SCH This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (12) TMI 1383 - SCH - SEBI


Issues:
1. Split verdict by the Securities Appellate Tribunal
2. Compliance with debarment order and disgorged amount payment
3. Interim relief - deposit in Investors' Protection Fund

Analysis:
1. The Supreme Court, comprising Hon'ble Dr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indu Malhotra, and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indira Banerjee, admitted an appeal against the Securities Appellate Tribunal's split verdict, which included a dissent by its Chairperson. The Court took into consideration the raised issues and decided to proceed with the appeal against the Tribunal's order dated 5 November 2020.

2. Regarding the compliance with the debarment order from dealing in equity derivatives and the payment of the disgorged amount, the appellants have adhered to the directive of the Whole Time Member of SEBI. The appellants were instructed to pay the disgorged amount of Rs 447.27 crores along with a simple interest rate of 12% per annum from 29 November 2007 until payment. As interim relief, the Court ordered the appellants to deposit Rs 250 crores in the Investors' Protection Fund within four weeks from the date of the order. Additionally, the Court stayed the recovery of the remaining amount, inclusive of interest, pending the final outcome of the appeal.

3. The interim relief granted by the Supreme Court aimed to ensure compliance with the regulatory directives while safeguarding the interests of investors. By ordering the deposit in the Investors' Protection Fund and staying the recovery of the balance pending appeal, the Court balanced the need for regulatory enforcement with the rights of the appellants to challenge the Tribunal's decision. This comprehensive approach demonstrated the Court's commitment to upholding the principles of financial market integrity and investor protection while ensuring due process and fairness in adjudicating disputes related to securities regulations.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates