Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Central Excise This

A Public Forum.
Acknowledging the Value of Experts.

Contribute Your Wisdom, Shape the Future.
Let Your Experience Guide Others

Submit new Issue / Query     My IssuesMy Replies
A free service.
You may submit an issue for brainstorming also.

Mandatory Pre-Deposit, Central Excise

Issue Id: - 109242
Dated: 5-10-2015
By:- SHIVKUMAR SHARMA

Mandatory Pre-Deposit


  • Contents

Dear Experts

Please Give your Expert advice Whether we can pay mandatory Pre-deposit from our Cenvat credit account while filling the Appeal to the Appealate authority.

SHIVKUMAR SHARMA

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 6 of 6 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 5-10-2015
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Yes because duty paid character remains the same whether it is paid through Cenvat Credit account or cash.


2 Dated: 5-10-2015
By:- SHIVKUMAR SHARMA

Dear Sir

As per our Excise authority the mandatory pre-deposit is required to be made by cash or e-payment only and not by debiting the cenvat account, maintained by us,under cenvat rules ,2004.Under new section 35-F of the central excise act 1944 .Effective from 06/08/2014 you have to only option to made Pre-deposit in cash or E-payment.

Pls.give any reference of authority or case law.

Shivkumar Sharma


3 Dated: 5-10-2015
By:- Rajagopalan Ranganathan

Sir,

Cenvat credit can be used for payment of excise duty which is accounted under minor heading 00380003-basic excise duty. Pre-deposit is to be accounted under minor head "other receipts-00380087. Sub-rule 4 of rule 3 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 indicated what kind of duty can be paid through cenvat credit account. Pre-deposit is not one of them. Therefore you have to pre-deposit only by cash.


4 Dated: 5-10-2015
By:- KASTURI SETHI

In this regard, the CESTAT has issued a Circular No. F. No. 15/ CESTAT/ general/ 2013-14 dated August 28, 2014 which clarified as follows:

  • Pre-deposit of the amount of Service tax or Excise Duty or Customs duty can also be made through reversal of CENVAT Credit apart from payment made in cash but Pre-deposit of the penalty amount has to be made in Cash.
  • 2010 (10) TMI 279 - CESTAT, MUMBAI, = MANAK MOTI FORGINGS PVT. LTD. Versus COMMR. OF C. EX., AURANGABAD

5 Dated: 5-10-2015
By:- YAGAY AND SUN

Dear Shiv Kumar,

 

For your kind information.

 

Regards,

 

YAGAY and SUN

 

F.No.15/CESTAT/General/2013-14
CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
WEST BLOCK NO.II, R K PURAM, NEW DELHI

Dated: August 28, 2014

CIRCULAR

Sub: Registration of appeals received on or after 06.08.2014 subsequent to amendment in the Customs Act, 1962, the Central Excise Act 1944 and the Finance Act, 1994- instructions- regd.

As there is confusion of adjustment of Cenvat Credit against mandatory penalty, clarifications have been sought from Competent authority. In absence of any classificatory Circular on the issue, all the DRs/ARs/TOs are directed that the appeals received on or after 06.08.2014 may be registered in following cases:

(i) If the mandatory deposit of duty or penalty, as the case may be, has been made in Cash and evidence thereof is produced at the time of filing appeal.

(ii) If mandatory deposit of duty confirmed is made from CENVAT account and evidence thereof is produced.

(iii) If the appellants have made deposit of the duty assessed subsequently, during investigation and if the same is more than the mandatory deposit as stipulated in the captioned amendments.

Whether further clarification is required the same will be issued after getting a clarification from the competent authority.

(A Mohan Kumar)
Registrar


6 Dated: 5-10-2015
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Sh.Shivkumar Sharma Ji,

I am of the view that the amount of pre-deposit towards duty portion , if made through Cenvat Credit Account, is covered under Rule 3(4)(a) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. This has support from CESTAT's Circular dated 28.8.14 and case law mentioned supra in my reply dated 5.10.15. Any further view from any learned person is always welcome pl.


Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates