Additions u/s 69A - Once the assessee has sold the ornaments in ...

Taxpayers Must Prove Source of Ornaments Sold u/s 69A; Inheritance or Past Acquisition Must Be Demonstrated.

April 4, 2014

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Additions u/s 69A - Once the assessee has sold the ornaments in this year, the onus was on the assessee to prove that it has been acquired either by way of inheritance or by her in the earlier years - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Additions u/s 69A - Once the assessee has sold the ornaments in ...

Taxpayers Must Prove Source of Ornaments Sold u/s 69A; Inheritance or Past Acquisition Must Be Demonstrated.

April 4, 2014

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Addition on account of capital introduction by the partners of the assessee-firm - The source of funds utilized for giving such gifts was explained as the sale proceeds...

Capital gain computation - cost of acquisition of the immovable property - The deduction on account of cost of acquisition is to be allowed with reference to the...

Addition u/s 69A - unexplained cash deposits in the bank account - onus to prove - The Tribunal noted that the appellant had provided evidence to support the source of...

Computation of indexed cost of acquisition for of computation of LTCG - property sold got from inheritance from ancestors - AT

Cash deposits during the demonetization period were recorded in the books of accounts, with the source maintained. The Assessing Officer invoked Section 69A and charged...

The ITAT Pune ruled on interest income from land acquisition and fixed deposits. Interest u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act is not taxable based on Bombay High Court...

Addition of capital gain - cost of indexation - JDA property - Though in the definition of 'indexed cost of acquisition', the word used are, "in which the asset was held...

Penalty for non deduction of tax at source - bona fide belief proved - penalty set aside - AT

Unexplained money u/s 69A read with Section 115BBE(1) - no explanation regarding source of cash deposit in savings account - case selected for limited scrutiny, thus...

The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered an addition u/s 69 concerning a difference in agreed and actual deal value, attributed to unexplained source of stamp duty...

ITAT upheld deletion of additions under s.69A r.w.s. 115BBE regarding cash deposits made during demonetization period. The taxpayer successfully demonstrated that...

The ITAT held that the reopening of assessment u/s 147 based on cash deposits during the year was invalid. The assessee demonstrated the source of cash deposits by...

Tax authority rejected rectification application filed by taxpayer for zero-rated supply citing violation of principles of natural justice. Court examined impugned...

The ITAT ruled that additions under section 69A regarding unexplained income were unjustified as the Assessing Officer failed to prove that cash withdrawals were used...

ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s deletion of additions made under s.69A r.w.s. 115BBE regarding unexplained cash deposits during demonetization. The assessee successfully...

Quick Updates: