Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2014 Year 2014 This

Merely because intimation u/s 143(1) was issued to the assessee ...


Assessment Order Valid Despite Timing of Notices u/ss 143(1) and 143(2), Says Court.

November 27, 2014

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Merely because intimation u/s 143(1) was issued to the assessee after issue of notice u/s 143(2), it cannot be said that an assessment order framed by the AO u/s 143(3) on a date after the date of such intimation is bad in law- AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Jurisdiction of the AO to frame the assessment order - Admittedly, when the ITO realized that he did not had the pecuniary jurisdiction to issue notice, he duly...

  2. Validity of notice issued u/s 143(2) with 142(1) - Period of limitation - Relevant Date - Date of filing of original return to be considered or date of removal of defect...

  3. Assessment u/s 153A - notice u/s 143 (2) - A specific notice is required to be issued u/s 153A(1)(a) calling upon the persons searched or requisitioned to file return -...

  4. Validity of Notice issued u/s 143(2) - Defective return - Removal of defect beyond 15 days u/s 139(9) - AO should have treated the return as non-est when the assessee...

  5. The jurisdictional Assessing Officer (AO) had suo moto transferred the assessment to Income Tax Officer (ITO), Ward 2(2) Noida. The appellant contended that the...

  6. Validity of reassessment u/s. 147 - non-issuance of notice u/s. 143(2) - Onus of filing of ROI on the assessee is a responsibility which is cast upon him to be fulfilled...

  7. Revision u/s 263 by CIT-A - Jurisdiction of AO - invalid notice u/s 143(2) - The issuance of notice u/s 143(2) is governed by statutorily prescribed procedures. On a...

  8. The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

  9. Section 142(1) notice issued by non-jurisdictional officer held valid. Plain reading of Section 143(2) indicates either Assessing Officer or prescribed income-tax...

  10. Validity of reopening of assessment - No statutory notice u/s 143(2) has been served - assessee failed to comply with the notice u/s 148 of the Act within the time...

  11. The ITAT held that the limitation period for issuing a notice u/s 143(2) is relevant to the financial year and assessment year. When the Assessing Officer considered the...

  12. The HC quashed the notice issued u/s 143(2) by the JAO for AY 2023-24, holding that the JAO lacked jurisdiction. As per section 144B(1)(iii), for scrutiny assessment...

  13. Jurisdiction assumed by DCIT not challenged within stipulated period, hence cannot be questioned now. Addition u/s 68 not sustainable as summary of receipts discloses...

  14. Validity of the notice issued u/s. 143(2) - statutory time limit to issue notice - the AO has issued notice u/s. 143(2) on 12/10/2020 after expiry of six months from the...

  15. Assessment framed without issuing mandatory notice u/s 143(2) by jurisdictional officer. Assessee filed return with Range-1(1), notice u/s 143(2) issued by ITO,...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates