Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2017 Year 2017 This

Penalty levied U/s. 271(1)(c) - false claim of exemption of LTCG ...

Case Laws     Income Tax

April 22, 2017

Penalty levied U/s. 271(1)(c) - false claim of exemption of LTCG u/s 10(38) - mere making of a claim, which is not sustainable in law, by itself, will not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars regarding the income of the assessee - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering...

  2. Penalty U/s. 271(1)(c) - claim of exemption u/s 10(38) whereas sale of shares was not through stock exchange - company adopted LIFO method where as AO adopted FIFO...

  3. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Claim of exemption u/s 10(38) where no STT was paid - the assessee having not disclosed fully and truly all the material facts relevant to the...

  4. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Denial of exemption of capital gains u/s 10(38) on account of sale of shares - The Tribunal also emphasized that the Revenue had failed...

  5. Assessee's claim for exemption u/s 10(35) was rejected by CPC while processing return u/s 143(1)(a), which attained finality as assessee failed to challenge it before...

  6. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Making an incorrect claim in law cannot tantamount to furnishing inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere making of a...

  7. MAT is paid, additions were made to regular income, penalty not levied – 115JB, 271(1)(c)

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - surrendered undisclosed income during the search and seizure - assessee contented that income disclosed in the return U/s 139(1) though claimed...

  9. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the assessee had declared LTCG and had claimed it as exempt u/s 10(38) as it suffered STT but subsequently withdrew the claim - at the most it...

  10. Bogus LTCG - genuineness of transaction not proved - exemption u/s 10(38) - assessee failed to prove genuineness of transaction and long-term capital gain on sale of...

  11. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

  12. Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

  13. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 35 - AO has not brought out his case as to why penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act...

  14. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases by applying the profit rate - Once there is no reason to disbelieve the sales made by the assessee and...

  15. Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates