Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The assessee had short term capital gain ...

Assessee's Penalty Deleted After Proving Bona Fide Belief in Capital Gains Claim u/s 271(1)(c.

April 18, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The assessee had short term capital gain on sale of land which was wrongly claimed as long term capital gain by substituting year of acquisition as 1999 instead of 2004 and said mistake was not brought to the notice of AO suo moto. In this background penalty was confirmed - penalty deleted since the assessee had a bonafide belief - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The assessee had short term capital gain ...

Assessee's Penalty Deleted After Proving Bona Fide Belief in Capital Gains Claim u/s 271(1)(c.

April 18, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty for non deduction of tax at source - bona fide belief proved - penalty set aside - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – In the garb of the bona fide claim an assessee cannot escape levy of penalty - Onus was not on the AO to prove the negative - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed for excess deduction claimed u/s 10B. The assessee furnished all relevant facts for computing total income, and provided detailed...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

The crux pertains to levying penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for alleged furnishing of inaccurate particulars or concealment of income regarding capital gains computation on sale...

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) – assessee in bona fide belief that Dharmada collections were not part of its income but were diverted by an overriding title towards...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The Revenue may or may not agree with this understanding of law of the assessee but the fact that there can be a bona fide view to that effect...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bonafide belief - Taxability of capital gain arises on sale of land - in absence of any monetary consideration assessee was under a bonafide...

No penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed on the assessee for disallowance of depreciation. The ITAT held that the assessee did not deliberately claim depreciation with an...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

The assessee failed to file the original return of income, and the Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings for underreporting income. The assessee's authorized...

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of depreciation - he explanation given by the assessee for the claim of depreciation is neither bona fide nor...

Imposition of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The explanation given by the assessee for the depreciation claim, is neither bona-fide, nor substantiated - penalty confirmed - HC

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - deduction of LTCG u/s 54F - The assessee acted in bona fide belief and made the claim is not acceptable due to any reason and was...

Quick Updates: