This is a case where entire quantification of demand is based on ...

Case Laws Central Excise

July 26, 2018

This is a case where entire quantification of demand is based on the statements of the purchaser the request for cross examination of the persons tendering the statements should have been allowed, in case the same is not allowed or possible, at least reasons thereof should have been recorded.

View Source

← Previous Next →

This is a case where entire quantification of demand is based on ...

Case Laws Central Excise

July 26, 2018

You may also like:

Clandestine removal demand based on electrical consumption was challenged. Average electricity consumption for certain periods was calculated. Cross-examination of...

Violation of principles of natural justice - opportunity for cross-examination. Evidentiary value of statements recorded u/s 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 cannot be...

This case pertains to an alleged offense under FEMA involving bogus purported exports with inflated invoices to obtain export benefits, where the goods never reached the...

Central Excise demands cannot be sustained solely based on confessional statements without corroborative documentary evidence. Retracted affidavits cannot be relied upon...

Demand of duty - receipt of inputs or not - demand based on statements of the suppliers of the inputs - cross-examination not allowed - Revenue has no other evidence -...

Clandestine removal - Gutkha - The entire case of the Revenue is based on uncorroborated, untested, unexamined and in some case retracted statement which do not inspire...

Principles of natural justice - rejection of cross-examination - The petitioner has approached this Court prematurely as the respondents have only rejected the request...

Validity of reassessment order u/s 147 - Denial of Cross-Examination Opportunity - Reliance of statement of third party - The High Court noted that the petitioner did...

The case pertains to the allegation of clandestine manufacture and clearance of structural items/rolled products by the appellant. The revenue's case rested solely on...

Clandestine removal - copper wires - demand based on various statements - retraction of statements - The counsel of Appellant before the appropriate forum, himself had...

The case before the Allahabad High Court involved the validity of reassessment proceedings initiated by the assessing authority based on information that the purchaser...

Sworn statements used against the writ petitioner - request for cross-examination - If statements are not going to be used against the writ petitioner, it cannot be...

Clandestine removal of excisable goods alleged based on statements recorded from partners, employees, and buyers. Section 9D of Central Excise Act mandates...

The High Court addressed a case involving a violation of natural justice principles due to the rejection of the petitioner's request for cross-examination in a matter...

Violation of principles of natural justice - denial of cross-examination - revocation of customs broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposed by...

Quick Updates: