Doubtlessy, numerosity adaptation effect should not influence ...

Case Laws Service Tax

November 19, 2018

Doubtlessy, numerosity adaptation effect should not influence judicial decisions but it would do well for the applicant Commissioner not to be oblivious of the congruity of cognition on 'duty free' supplies and to forbear from projecting any dissonance with the decision of the Tribunal as lapsus calami.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Doubtlessy, numerosity adaptation effect should not influence ...

Case Laws Service Tax

November 19, 2018

You may also like:

Rectification application u/s 254 - Tribunal not followed the decision on the identical facts by the Coordinate Bench which is confirmed by this Court - The Court...

The High Court held that the impugned Press Release by the Ministry of Finance, purporting to direct judicial and quasi-judicial authorities to classify all...

Liquidation of Corporate Debtor - CoC’s decision to liquidate was tainted with material irregularity and arbitrariness or not - the NCLAT found no material irregularity...

Latest GST Notifications (CGST Rate and IGST Rate) to give effect to gst council decisions

Judicial discipline - Where facts and law in a subsequent assessment year are the same, no authority whether quasi judicial or judicial can generally be permitted to...

Scope of Judicial Review – Review of the decision of the Settlement Commission - There is limited scope of judicial review - Despite such narrow confines of judicial...

The decisions of the Hon’ble non-jurisdictional High Court have no relevance in the present context. It is also elementary in law that the mere pendency of the appeal,...

The decision making process is as important as the correctness of the decision itself. Merely because the correctness of the decision appears unquestionable, the serious...

Legality of revision of order of Tribunal u/s 254 on ground of retrospective overruling - Judicial decision acts retrospectively. Judges do not make law they only...

The case pertains to the rectification of a mistake and reopening of assessment u/s 147 versus assessment u/s 153C. The information or seized document belonging to the...

Validity of policy decision - Imposing prohibition on export of Shark fins of all species of Shark - The rationality of the decision cannot be adjudged on a proof of...

Appellate Authority which exercised quasi-judicial power should not be influenced by departmental clarifications and Board Tariff Ruling while adjudicating the cases.

Judicial Discipline - Seeking refund of accumulated Cenvat credit - input services or not - The department had not accepted the judgement in the case of Paul Merchants...

Benefit of SabkaVishwas Legal Dispute Resolution Scheme (SVLDRS), 2019 - The High Court observed that, the Supreme Court had an effect of extending the period of...

Scope of challenge to orders passed by the ITSC - Validity of exercising discretion by the ITSC in granting relief to the assessee - Granting immunity from prosecution...

Quick Updates: