Validity of Cross Objection (CO) filed by the Revenue - the ...

December 29, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Validity of Cross Objection (CO) filed by the Revenue - the revenue is trying to achieve its objectives, which could not be achieved by it directly - Further, in the absence of approval of Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, the reframed grounds of the revenue are liable to be rejected on this ground also. - CO rejected.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of Cross Objection (CO) filed by the Revenue - the ...

December 29, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The summary focuses on the rejection of cross-examination of DRI officers and a co-noticee by the competent authority. The main objective of cross-examination is to...

GST Revenue collections for the month of October 2018 crosses Rupees One Lac Crore

Validity of reassessment order u/s 147 - Denial of Cross-Examination Opportunity - Reliance of statement of third party - The High Court noted that the petitioner did...

Challenge to the letter regarding payment of arrears of tax and interest accrued. - What the petitioner failed to achieve directly is trying to achieve indirectly. - HC

Validity of SCN - The appellants are trying to defeat the proceedings by seeking cross examination of the people who were their employees and have now left. - They...

Violation of principles of natural justice - denial of cross-examination - revocation of customs broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposed by...

Denial of cross-examination process of witness - ACIT restricted cross examination process by denying the questions asked by the Petitioner during cross examination -...

Restoration of cross objection appeal - Dismissal of appeal of the revenue on low tax effect - consequently cross objections of the assessee were also dismissed - the...

Misdeclaration of description and value - Validity of test report - Cross examination of Chemical Examiner - In the present matter, refusal to allow cross-examination of...

Violation of principles of natural justice - opportunity for cross-examination. Evidentiary value of statements recorded u/s 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 cannot be...

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) set aside the impugned order and remanded the cases back to the adjudicating authority. The appellants...

Dishonor of Cheque - seeking cross examination of the complainant officer of the bank - In the present application the recall, re-cross examination of the complainant is...

Principles of natural justice - rejection of cross-examination - The petitioner has approached this Court prematurely as the respondents have only rejected the request...

Validity of FCRA registration certificates extended for certain categories of entities. Entities whose validity extended till 30.06.2024 and renewal pending, validity...

Prohibition on import of Palm oil – Violation of Article 14 – Revenue have been able to demonstrate intelligible basis for issuing impugned Notifications having rational...

Quick Updates: