It cannot be said that only because audit party had found some ...

Case Laws Central Excise

May 7, 2019

It cannot be said that only because audit party had found some credit availed as inadmissible, suppression of fact is made out. Further it is not established that appellant had any malafide intention to suppress its duty liability from the department.

View Source

← Previous Next →

It cannot be said that only because audit party had found some ...

Case Laws Central Excise

May 7, 2019

You may also like:

This case pertains to the utilization of ineligible CENVAT credit by a company. The key points are: The company availed ineligible CENVAT credit amounting to Rs....

Refund of service tax paid - entitlement for Cenvat credit of the service tax paid on the ocean freight on the reverse charge mechanism - rejection of refund on the...

Imposition of penalty - its availment of allegedly inadmissible credit was previously subjected to scrutiny by the audit parties at least on three occasions as reveals...

Penalty - Suppression of facts or not - Extend period of limitation - Service tax paid on Reverse Charge Mechanism and credit was availed even after issuance of SCN -...

Extended period of limitation - related party transaction - in two audits conducted earlier audit party did not raise any objections with regard to valuation and...

The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the notice issued u/s 65 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for conducting an audit for the...

Levy of Penalty - suppression of facts or not - Availment of Irregular Credit - Demand based on Audit observations - the appellant immediately reversed the credit as and...

CENVAT Credit - input services or not - The appellant has successfully established that these three zonal offices are integral part and parcel of the appellant only and...

Refund of CVD/SAD paid - Unable to avail and utilize the credit of CVD/SAD paid by them as payment was made on 30.09.2020 when no provision exist in GST regime to avail...

Cenvat credit – suo motu credit on the amount paid by assessee erroneously earlier – suo motu credit availed by the appellant is inadmissible to them - AT

The case pertains to the reopening of assessment u/s 147, where the reasons recorded were based on audit objections raised by the internal audit party regarding...

CENVAT Credit - Removal of capital goods - Depreciation - Deduction of 2.5% to be applied from the date of availing credit, not from the date of receiving or putting to...

CENVAT Credit - Rule 9(1)(bb) - duty paying invoices - it is clear that the department has accepted that there is no suppression of facts. To establish suppression of...

Refund of CENVAT credit of CVD and SAD paid by them - appellant has paid the duties only after issuing SCN - there is no allegation of any fraud, collusion or...

The appellant, engaged in manufacturing soda ash, availed CENVAT credit amounting to Rs. 46,27,417/- for the period 03.12.2005 to 31.03.2012 on input services utilized...

Quick Updates: