It cannot be said that only because audit party had found some ...

Audit Finding Does Not Prove Intentional Suppression of Duty Liability by Appellant; No Automatic Inference of Fact Suppression.

May 7, 2019

Case Laws Central Excise AT

It cannot be said that only because audit party had found some credit availed as inadmissible, suppression of fact is made out. Further it is not established that appellant had any malafide intention to suppress its duty liability from the department.

View Source

← Previous Next →

It cannot be said that only because audit party had found some ...

Audit Finding Does Not Prove Intentional Suppression of Duty Liability by Appellant; No Automatic Inference of Fact Suppression.

May 7, 2019

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Central excise duty exemption notification dated 01.03.2002 was denied, leading to recovery of duty, interest, and penalty. The extended period of limitation was invoked....

Confiscation - Smuggling of Betel Nuts - discharge of burden to prove u/s 123 of Customs Act - The betel nut is not notified under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed issues regarding the method of valuation of electrical motors, whether to apply Rule 8 or Rule 4 of the Central Excise (Valuation)...

CESTAT allowed the appeal against denial of excise duty exemption under N/N. 01/2011-CE, setting aside Commissioner's order. The Tribunal held that extended period of...

Refund claim of the amount reversed under protest - if there is a short payment of duty, the only option for the Revenue is to follow the procedure prescribed under...

Professional misconduct by CA - Liability of the Engagement partner with audit firm - Acceptance of the Audit Engagement - The NFRA concluded that the audit firm and the...

Refund of CENVAT credit of CVD and SAD paid by them - appellant has paid the duties only after issuing SCN - there is no allegation of any fraud, collusion or...

Extended period of limitation - suppression of facts or not - It is for the Superintendent to scrutinize the returns and ascertain if the service tax had been paid...

Imposition of penalty - intention to evade service tax - it is found that the contention of the appellant that they bona fidely believed that they are not liable to pay...

The petitioner challenged the issuance of multiple audit memos determining tax liability beyond the stipulated period u/s 65(4) of the CGST/DGST Act. While the multiple...

Export of the goods - claim of duty drawback - Mere allegation of wrong classification without proving intentional mala fide cannot lead to imposition of penalty - CGOVT

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The duty is cast upon the assessee to make true and full disclosure of the facts at the time of original assessment. The duty of the...

Levy of penalty u/s 271B - not getting books of account audited u/s 44AB - AO has given categorically finding that the assessee had made frequent transaction in both...

Tribunal found assessee had reasonable cause for delay in furnishing Tax Audit Report due to delay in finalization of statutory audit arising from dispute between Board...

Invoking the extended period of limitation u/s 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act for recovery of unpaid duty. The key points are: The department alleged suppression of...

Quick Updates: